Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorDoganay Yildiz, Ezgi
dc.contributor.authorDincer, Buket
dc.contributor.authorFidan, Mehmet Eren
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-14T18:10:54Z
dc.date.available2021-01-14T18:10:54Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationBu makale açık erişimli değildir.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0001-6357
dc.identifier.issn1502-3850
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2020.1717603
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/12818
dc.descriptionWOS:000511311000001en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 31986947en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study was to compare apical debris extrusion when neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet (Nd:YAG) lasers, erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet (Er:YAG) or photon-induced photoacoustic streaming (PIPS) are used for irrigation activation. Materials and methods: A total of 60 extracted human mandibular premolar teeth have similar dimensions were included and the samples were split into four groups according to the irrigation technique (n = 15): conventional needle irrigation, PIPS, Er:YAG and Nd:YAG. ProTaper Universal system up to F4 was used for root canal instrumentation. Bidistilled water was used as an irrigation solution during instrumentation and irrigation activation. Apically extruded debris was collected into preweighed Eppendorf tubes during instrumentation and irrigation activation procedures. The tubes were then kept in an incubator at 70 degrees C for 5 days. The initial weight of the tube was subtracted from the final weight and the result was recorded as the weight of dry extruded debris. The data were evaluated statistically using a one-way ANOVA test followed by least significant difference post hoc test (p < .05). Results: Conventional needle irrigation caused significantly less debris extrusion than laser-assisted irrigation activation groups (p < .05). Laser-assisted irrigation activation groups caused statistically similar debris extrusion (p > .05). Conclusion: Laser-assisted irrigation activation techniques caused more debris extrusion when compared to conventional needle irrigation.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTAYLOR & FRANCIS LTDen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1080/00016357.2020.1717603en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectIrrigationen_US
dc.subjectlaser-assisted irrigation activationen_US
dc.subjectdebrisen_US
dc.titleEffect of different laser-assisted irrigation activation techniques on apical debris extrusionen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentKKÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume78en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.startpage332en_US
dc.identifier.endpage336en_US
dc.relation.journalACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICAen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster