Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorSivrikaya, Burak
dc.contributor.authorDemir, İlhami
dc.contributor.authorSevim, Özer
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-14T18:19:27Z
dc.date.available2021-01-14T18:19:27Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn2149-8024
dc.identifier.issn2149-8024
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.20528/cjsmec.2020.02.003
dc.identifier.urihttps://app.trdizin.gov.tr/makale/TXpjeU1qRTBOQT09
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/13675
dc.description.abstractConcrete has a significant place in construction structures, is a material that can be easily damaged due to incorrect design, incorrect material selection. Concrete may be damaged by physical and chemical factors. One of these factors is the alkali-silica reaction (ASR). ASTM C1260, is a short-term test method, and ASTM C227, is a longterm test method, are used to measure effect of alkali-silica reaction. In this study, the effect of fly ash additive use with 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 wt.% replacement of cement was investigated in short- and long-term ASR test methods. For this purpose, while samples prepared for ASTM C1260 were kept in NaOH solution 14-days, samples prepared for ASTM C227 were waited 360-days in normal water solution. As a result; mortar bars with 20% fly ash additive ratio were classified as harmless for ASR in both test methods.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.20528/cjsmec.2020.02.003en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.titleComparison of short- and long-term ASR test methods on cementitious compositesen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume6en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage68en_US
dc.identifier.endpage72en_US
dc.relation.journalChallenge Journal of Structural Mechanicsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster