Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorSenay S.
dc.contributor.authorToraman F.
dc.contributor.authorGunaydin S.
dc.contributor.authorKilercik M.
dc.contributor.authorKarabulut H.
dc.contributor.authorAlhan C.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-25T15:14:26Z
dc.date.available2020-06-25T15:14:26Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.issn15699293
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1510/icvts.2008.183608
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/2109
dc.descriptionPubMed: 18801802en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study is designed to determine and compare the effects of transfusion and coated circuits on the inflammatory response during cardiopulmonary bypass. Methods: Forty patients were randomized into two groups according to the type of extracorporeal circuit used and later prospectively enrolled into two subgroups according to the need for red cell transfusion during CPB (leading to 4 groups - 10 patients per group; group 1: with no transfusion and standard oxygenator, group 2: with transfusion and standard oxygenator, group 3: with no transfusion and coated oxygenator, group 4: with transfusion and coated oxygenator). Serum lactate, interleukin 6, human tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-?), D-dimer and CRP levels were measured at three time points (T1: start of CPB, T2: before removal of aortic cross-clamp, T3: 45 min after the completion of proximal anastomoses). Protein adsorption of oxygenator fibers was measured. Outcome parameters were recorded. Results: Interleukin 6, TNF-?, D-dimer and lactate levels increased at T2 and T3 in all groups (P<0.05 within groups). The increase in interleukin 6 was significant at T2 in group 2 when compared to group 1 (8.0 ± 3.9 vs. 4.4 ± 1.8, P=0.03). The increase in TNF-alpha was higher at T2 in group 1 when compared to group 3 (16.0 ± 4.2 vs. 11.7 ± 2.8, P=0.05) and in group 2 when compared to group 3 at T2 and T3 (15.3 ± 4.6 vs. 11.7 ± 2.8, P=0.06; 17.6 ± 5.0 vs. 13.7 ± 3.9, P=0.06). Protein adsorption was higher in group 1 and group 2 (group 1 vs. group 3, 2.2 ± 0.8 vs. 1.4 ± 0.3, P=0.01; group 2 vs. group 3, 2.4 ± 0.7 vs. 1.4 ± 0.3, P=0.02; group 2 vs. group 4, 2.4 ± 0.7 vs. 1.8 ± 0.3, P=0.04), it was also higher at group 4 when compared to group 3 (1.8 ± 0.3 vs. 1.4 ± 0.3, P=0.03). Conclusions: Allogenic red cell transfusion enhances inflammatory response during CPB; coated circuit systems have a limiting effect on this inflammatory reaction. © 2009 Published by European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1510/icvts.2008.183608en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBlood transfusionen_US
dc.subjectCardiopulmonary bypassen_US
dc.subjectCoated circuitsen_US
dc.subjectInflammationen_US
dc.titleThe impact of allogenic red cell transfusion and coated bypass circuit on the inflammatory response during cardiopulmonary bypass: A randomized studyen_US
dc.typeconferenceObjecten_US
dc.contributor.departmentKırıkkale Üniversitesien_US
dc.identifier.volume8en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage93en_US
dc.identifier.endpage99en_US
dc.relation.journalInteractive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster