Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorSungu, Nuran
dc.contributor.authorYavuz, Sibel
dc.contributor.authorMarali, Seda
dc.contributor.authorBalci, Serdar
dc.contributor.authorKilicarslan, Aydan
dc.contributor.authorAltunkaya, Canan
dc.contributor.authorGuler, Gulnur
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-25T18:16:07Z
dc.date.available2020-06-25T18:16:07Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationclosedAccessen_US
dc.identifier.issn0303-6987
dc.identifier.issn1600-0560
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/cup.12790
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/6427
dc.descriptionBALCI, Serdar/0000-0002-7852-3851; TATLI DOGAN, Hayriye/0000-0003-4318-2775en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000386779400009en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 27513982en_US
dc.description.abstractBackgroundWe intended to study whether there is a meaningful difference in microscopic examination between dividing a biopsy section into two equal parts before tissue processing (first method) or after (second method). MethodsA total of 400 cases were included in the study. Punch biopsies (PB) were cut into two pieces using the first method in 200 cases and just before paraffin embedding in another 200 cases using the second method. We microscopically evaluated the epidermal mesh view, the presence of a cross-cut hair follicle and bow shape because of epidermal angling, the presence of two pieces on the slide and if there was a difference of >2 mm between the parts, and the number of new sections and new slides. ResultsCross-cut hair follicle (p = 0.018), epidermal mesh view (p = 0.036), difference of >2 mm between the parts (p = 0.008), the number of new sections (p < 0.001) and new slides (p < 0.001) were considerably higher when the first method was used compared with the second method. The presence of two pieces was less (p < 0.001) when using the first method. ConclusionsWe noted a meaningful difference in the quality of microscopic evaluation between the first and second methods. Better sections were obtained with the second method. In addition, the decrease in the number of new slides will reduce workload, archival work and cost.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwellen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1111/cup.12790en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectdermatopathologyen_US
dc.subjectmicroscopyen_US
dc.subjectpunch biopsy formalin fixationen_US
dc.subjectskinen_US
dc.titleSkin punch biopsy sectioning: before or after tissue processing?en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentKırıkkale Üniversitesien_US
dc.identifier.volume43en_US
dc.identifier.issue11en_US
dc.identifier.startpage984en_US
dc.identifier.endpage988en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal Of Cutaneous Pathologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster