Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorUcar, Faruk I.
dc.contributor.authorCelebi, Ahmet A.
dc.contributor.authorTan, Enes
dc.contributor.authorTopcuoglu, Tolga
dc.contributor.authorSekerci, Ahmet Ercan
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-25T18:23:02Z
dc.date.available2020-06-25T18:23:02Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationclosedAccessen_US
dc.identifier.issn1434-5293
dc.identifier.issn1615-6714
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-016-0077-6
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/6987
dc.descriptionWOS: 000401504000006en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 28204849en_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to analyze the amount of root resorption of maxillary lateral incisors by relating the position, location, and angulation of the impacted canine using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). The study sample consisted of panoramic and CBCT radiographs of 46 patients with a unilateral impacted canine (16 males and 30 females; mean age: 19.53 +/- 6.66 and 19.44 +/- 5.77 years, respectively). Sector location and canine angulation were measured in panoramics. All tomographs were obtained using CBCT (NewTom 5G, QR, Verona, Italy) and three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions of the maxillary laterals assessed by Mimics 14.01 image analysis software. Upper lateral incisor volume was smaller on the impacted side (401.95 +/- 83.69 mm(3)) than on the nonimpacted side (433.54 +/- 92.6 mm(3), P < 0.05). There were no significant differences of lateral root resorption volume when comparing the impacted canines being on the labial or palatal sides (P > 0.05), but impacted canine angulation was significantly steeper on the labial side (70.85A degrees) than on the palatal side (46.09A degrees, P < 0.05). The volume of root resorption of laterals when comparing the various positions of the canine in different sectors or canine angulation in 30(o) intervals was not statistically significantly different (P > 0.05). The impacted canines caused root resorption of lateral incisors. The angulation of the canine was steeper on the labial side than on the palatal side but root resorption of adjacent laterals was not different. There were no statistically significant differences in the amount of root resorption of the laterals when the canine was evaluated according to localization and angulation.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherUrban & Vogelen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/s00056-016-0077-6en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectImpacted maxillary caninesen_US
dc.subjectLateral root resorptionsen_US
dc.subjectCone beam computed tomographyen_US
dc.subjectDentitionen_US
dc.subjectPermanenten_US
dc.subjectTooth rooten_US
dc.titleEffects of impacted maxillary canines on root resorption of lateral incisorsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentKırıkkale Üniversitesien_US
dc.identifier.volume78en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage233en_US
dc.identifier.endpage240en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal Of Orofacial Orthopedics-Fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadieen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster