Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorBaran, Ilgi
dc.contributor.authorArslan, Merve
dc.contributor.authorGungor, Hamiyet
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-25T18:29:19Z
dc.date.available2020-06-25T18:29:19Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationBaran, Ilgi; Arslan, Merve; Güngör, Hamiyet,. Effect of Different Framework Materials of Resin-Bonded Bridges on Load to Fracture Values and Stress Distribution. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice 21(12):p 1585-1589, December 2018.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1119-3077
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_281_18
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/7231
dc.descriptionWOS: 000454199000006en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 30560821en_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aim of this study was to compare in vitro fracture strengths (FSs) of metal- and fiber-reinforced frameworks of resin-bonded bridges and to evaluate stress distribution with finite element analysis (FEA). Materials and Methods: Totally 80 extracted maxillary central and maxillary canine teeth were used for in vitro part of this study as two groups; metal-reinforced framework (n = 20) [(metal-supported resin-bonded bridge (MR-RB)] and fiber-reinforced frameworks (n = 20) [fiber-reinforced resin-bonded bridge (FR-RB) were prepared for three unit resin-bonded bridges. All bridges were loaded from lateral pontic at 1 mm/min crosshead speed and fracture values were recorded. MannuWhitney U-test was used for statistical analysis, and fracture patterns were evaluated visually. FEA was carried out in the second part of the study, and stress distribution of MR-RB and FR-RB structures was analyzed using one of the models from in vitro specimens as main model. Results: The mean FSs of MR-RB and FR-RB were 637.47 151.91 N and 224.86 80.97 N, respectively. Fiber-reinforced specimens were found to distribute stress more homogeneous and connectors in each framework were the regions where stress concentrated mostly. Conclusion: In vitro FSs of MR-RB and the stress concentration of the point that the forces were applied were higher as compared to other parts of the restoration. Furthermore, in contrast to FR-RB specimens, retainer tooth fractures were observed in MR-RB specimens.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipKirikkale University Scientific Research Projects Coordination UnitKirikkale University [2014/009]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was carried out by the support of Kirikkale University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit with project no. 2014/009.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer Medknow Publicationsen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.4103/njcp.njcp_281_18en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectFinite element analysisen_US
dc.subjectfracture strengthen_US
dc.subjectresin-bonded bridgesen_US
dc.titleEffect of different framework materials of resin-bonded bridges on load to fracture values and stress distributionen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentKırıkkale Üniversitesien_US
dc.identifier.volume21en_US
dc.identifier.issue12en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1585en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1589en_US
dc.relation.journalNigerian Journal Of Clinical Practiceen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster