International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis
Göster/ Aç
Tarih
2018Yazar
Wise, Sarah K.Lin, Sandra Y.
Toskala, Elina
Orlandi, Richard R.
Akdis, Cezmi A.
Alt, Jeremiah A.
Willson, Thomas J.
Üst veri
Tüm öğe kaydını gösterKünye
Wise, SK, Lin, SY, Toskala, E, et al. International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2018; 8: 108– 352.Özet
Background: Critical examination of the quality and validity of available allergic rhinitis (AR) literature is necessary to improve understanding and to appropriately translate this knowledge to clinical care of the AR patient. To evaluate the existing AR literature, international multidisciplinary experts with an interest in AR have produced the International Consensus statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (ICAR:AR). Methods: Using previously described methodology, specific topics were developed relating to AR. Each topic was assigned a literature review, evidence-based review (EBR), or evidence-based review with recommendations (EBRR) format as dictated by available evidence and purpose within the ICAR:AR document. Following iterative reviews of each topic, the ICAR:AR document was synthesized and reviewed by all authors for consensus. Results: The ICAR:AR document addresses over 100 individual topics related to AR, including diagnosis, pathophysiology, epidemiology, disease burden, risk factors for the development of AR, allergy testing modalities, treatment, and other conditions/comorbidities associated with AR. Conclusion: This critical review of the AR literature has identified several strengths; providers can be confident that treatment decisions are supported by rigorous studies. However, there are also substantial gaps in the AR literature. These knowledge gaps should be viewed as opportunities for improvement, as often the things that we teach and the medicine that we practice are not based on the best quality evidence. This document aims to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the AR literature to identify areas for future AR research and improved understanding. (C) 2018 ARS-AAOA, LLC.
Kaynak
International Forum Of Allergy & RhinologyCilt
8Sayı
2Koleksiyonlar
- Makale Koleksiyonu [253]
- PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [2703]
- WOS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [5632]
İlgili Öğeler
Başlık, yazar, küratör ve konuya göre gösterilen ilgili öğeler.
-
Alternative products to treat allergic rhinitis and alternative routes for allergy immunotherapy
Ipci K.; Oktemer T.; Muluk N.B.; Şahin E.; Altintoprak N.; Bafaqeeh S.A.; Cingi C. (OceanSide Publications Inc., 2016)Background: Some alternative products instead of immunotherapy are used in patients with allergic rhinitis (AR). Methods: In this paper, alternative products to treat allergic rhinitis and alternative routes for allergy ... -
Clinical efficacy of immunotherapy in allergic rhinitis
Oktemer T.; Altintoprak N.; Muluk N.B.; Senturk M.; Kar M.; Bafaqeeh S.A.; Cingi C. (OceanSide Publications Inc., 2016)Background: Aeroallergen immunotherapy (AIT) should be considered for patients who exhibit symptoms of allergic rhinitis (AR), rhinoconjunctivitis, and/or asthma after natural exposure to allergens and who also demonstrate ... -
Efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy for house dust mite allergic rhinitis
Cingi, Cemal; Bayar Muluk, Nuray; Ulusoy, Seckin; Acar, Mustafa; Sirin, Seher; Cobanoglu, Bengu; Bal, Cengiz (Springer, 2015)In the present study, we investigated the outcomes of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in house dust mite-induced allergic rhinitis (HDM-AR) patients. In this prospective, multicentric study, 186 patients with AR who had ...