Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorAtan, Ali
dc.contributor.authorMurad Bşsar, M.
dc.contributor.authorTuncel, Altuğ
dc.contributor.authorMert, Cağatay
dc.contributor.authorAslan, Yılmaz
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-25T17:43:56Z
dc.date.available2020-06-25T17:43:56Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.citationclosedAccessen_US
dc.identifier.issn0301-1623
dc.identifier.issn1573-2584
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org10.1007/s11255-006-9153-y
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/3953
dc.descriptionASLAN, YILMAZ/0000-0003-0670-6840en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000246203900044en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 17225065en_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose To investigate the relationship among the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), and Aging Males' Symptoms (AMS) scale scores in various age groups of males. Patients and methods A total of 307 male patients enrolled in the study. Mean age was 52.3 (range 21-77) years. Group 1 consisted of 51 (<= 39 years), Group 2 consisted of 160 (40-59 years), and Group 3 consisted of 96 (>= 60 years) patients. First five and 15th questions of the IIEF, IPSS, and AMS scale were replied by all the patients. The patients were assessed based on the IIEF for erectile dysfunction (ED), IPSS for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), and AMS scale for Symptomatic Late-Onset Hypogonadism (SLOH). Results ED, LUTS, and SLOH symptoms were detected in 236 (76.8%), 162 (52.8%), and 184 (59.9%) patients. Except for total AMS scores, IIEF and IPSS scores were significantly different among the groups (p(AMS) = 0.320, p(IIEF) = 0.000, p(IPSS) = 0.000). In the comparisons of the IIEF scores between the each group, significant differences were observed (p(Group1-Group2) = 0.000, p(Group1-Group3) = 0.000, p(Group2-Group3) = 0.000). Nevertheless, IPSS score was significantly lower in the patients with age <= 39 years than the other age groups (p = 0.000). Conclusions In the present study, ED ratio and LUTS severity significantly increased in older men. We did not find significant relationship between aging and SLOH symptoms. In the light of our results, LUTS seems to be an important risk factor on erectile function.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/s11255-006-9153-yen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectagingen_US
dc.subjectsexual dysfunctionen_US
dc.subjectLUTSen_US
dc.subjectSLOHen_US
dc.subjectassessmenten_US
dc.titleIs there a relationship among age, international index of erectile function, international prostate symptom score, and aging males' symptoms score?en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume39en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage215en_US
dc.identifier.endpage222en_US
dc.relation.journalInternational Urology And Nephrologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster