Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorKandemir, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorPalanci, Mehmet
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-25T18:12:22Z
dc.date.available2020-06-25T18:12:22Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationKandemir, M.A., & Palanci, M. (2014). Academic Functional Procrastination: Validity and Reliability Study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 194-198.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1877-0428
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.180
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/5886
dc.descriptionERPA International Congress on Education (ERPA) -- JUN 06-08, 2014 -- Istanbul Univ, Istanbul, TURKEYen_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000348253300036en_US
dc.description.abstractWhen the relevant literature about Procrastination behavior, also known as postdating of tasks, is studied, it is stated that this behavior isn't always negative and there can be functional procrastinations, as well. Functional procrastination represents an acceptable frequent behavior which increases success at work, makes persons more advantageous and acts as a success strategy towards a pre-designed goal that generally results in success at work. It is seen that procrastination behavior, mostly seen among students, is not sufficiently researched because of the fact that there aren't any scales, functional features of which are improved. Within this context, the objective of the research is to develop a scale that can assess the functional procrastination behavior of the students. For this reason, total 365 students of different demographic features and in different grades are taken into account. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was applied to the scale for the structure validity of the scale, and single factor structure became apparent. Then, Confirmatory- Factor Analysis (CFA) was applied to the relevant structure. This CFA analysis was performed with new data taken from 295 students. After the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was performed, concordance values of Academic Functional Procrastination Scale was found as follows: X2 /sd= 55.08/ 27 (2.04); RMSEA, .05; CFI, .96; GFI, .95; NFI, .94; IFI, .97; and RFI, .90. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipERPAen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Science Bven_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesProcedia Social and Behavioral Sciences
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.180en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectprocrastinationen_US
dc.subjectacademic procrastinationen_US
dc.subjectfunctional procrastinationen_US
dc.subjectvalidationen_US
dc.subjectreliabilityen_US
dc.titleAcademic functional procrastination: Validity and reliability studyen_US
dc.typeconferenceObjecten_US
dc.contributor.departmentKırıkkale Üniversitesien_US
dc.identifier.volume152en_US
dc.identifier.startpage194en_US
dc.identifier.endpage198en_US
dc.relation.journalErpa International Congress On Education (Erpa Congress 2014)en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster