Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorDurgun, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorOzakpinar, Hulda Rifat
dc.contributor.authorSelcuk, Caferi Tayyar
dc.contributor.authorSari, Elif
dc.contributor.authorSeven, Ergin
dc.contributor.authorInozu, Emre
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-25T18:12:48Z
dc.date.available2020-06-25T18:12:48Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationclosedAccessen_US
dc.identifier.issn0148-7043
dc.identifier.issn1536-3708
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000000398
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/6047
dc.descriptionWOS: 000361609000012en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 26360651en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground The repair of full-thickness nasal alar defects presents difficulties because of their complex 3-dimensional structure. Reconstructions using inappropriate methods may lead to asymmetries and dissatisfying functional results. In this study, our aim was to present the repairs of full-thickness alar defects performed using cartilage-supported nasolabial perforator flaps. Materials and Methods Eight patients who presented to our clinic between January 2011 and April 2014 with full-thickness defects in the alar wings were included in this study. The nasolabial perforator flap was prepared on the basis of the closest perforator to the defect area and in a way to include 2 to 3 mm of subcutaneous adipose tissue. The medial section of the flap was adapted to form the nasal lining. In the 7 patients in whom cartilage support was used, the cartilage graft was obtained from the septum nasi. After the cartilage was placed on the flap, the lateral section of the flap was folded over the medial section and the defect was repaired. In 1 patient in whom cartilage support was not required, the flap was folded over itself before the repair was performed. The flap donor area was primarily repaired. Results No detachment around the suture lines, infection, venous insufficiency in the flap, or partial or total flap losses were observed in any of the patients. Retraction developed in 1 patient in whom no cartilage support was used. No retraction was observed in any of the patients in whom cartilage support was used. The results were functionally and esthetically satisfying in all the patients. Conclusions The greatest advantage of perforator-based nasolabial flaps is the greater mobilization achieved in comparison with the other nasolabial flaps. Thus, full-thickness defects can be repaired in 1 session in some patients, no revision is required around the flap pedicle, and much less donor area morbidity occurs. Nasal alar reconstructions performed using this type of flap lead to both esthetically and functionally satisfying results.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1097/SAP.0000000000000398en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectnasal alaen_US
dc.subjectskin tumoren_US
dc.subjectnasolabial perforator flapen_US
dc.titleRepair of Full-Thickness Nasal Alar Defects Using Nasolabial Perforator Flapsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentKırıkkale Üniversitesien_US
dc.identifier.volume75en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage414en_US
dc.identifier.endpage417en_US
dc.relation.journalAnnals Of Plastic Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster