Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorDaglar, Bulent
dc.contributor.authorDelialioglu, Onder Murat
dc.contributor.authorBayrakci, Kenan
dc.contributor.authorTezel, Kerem
dc.contributor.authorGunel, Ugur
dc.contributor.authorCeyhan, Erman
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-25T18:22:30Z
dc.date.available2020-06-25T18:22:30Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationDağlar, B., Delialioğlu, Ö. M., Bayrakcı, K., Tezel, K., Günel, U., & Ceyhan, E. (2016). Intracompartmental pressure changes after anterolateral bridge plating of tibial fractures. Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica, 50(1), 37–41.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1017-995X
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3944/AOTT.2016.15.0139
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/6767
dc.descriptionWOS: 000370087700008en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 26854047en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: Compartment syndrome is one of the most devastating complications in orthopedics both for the patient and the treating physician. Among the many causes, trauma and its treatment are the most common reasons for compartment syndrome, which most frequently occurs in the lower leg following tibial fractures. Since bridge plating of difficult metadiaphyseal tibial fractures is becoming increasingly popular, serious concerns have been raised about the increased intracompartmental pressures and possible compartment syndrome. Methods: This study investigated the intracompartmental pressure changes in anterolateral compartment of the leg during and immediately after anterolateral bridge plating of tibial fractures. Intracompartmental pressures were measured before and during plate application, just after the completion of fixation, and immediately and 4-5 min after the tourniquet release in 22 isolated closed comminuted tibial fractures. Results: Baseline anterolateral compartment pressures were higher than those on the uninjured side (9.3 vs 27.8 mmHg). Pressures were 69.5, 57.4, 65.8, and 56.8 mmHg, respectively, for the other measurements times. None of the patients received prophylactic fasciotomy, and none developed clinical compartment syndrome. Conclusion: We found that anterolateral compartmental pressures were higher than pressures on the uninjured side in all patients. Although there is a considerable increase in intracompartmental pressures during and immediately after anterolateral percutaneous bridge plating of comminuted tibial fractures, intraoperative prophylactic fasciotomy is not routinely needed. One should monitor the patients on the first postoperative day for signs of compartment syndrome. Fasciotomy decisions should be based on both clinical symptoms and serial intracompartmental pressure measurements rather than a single measurement.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTurkish Assoc Orthopaedics Traumatologyen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.3944/AOTT.2016.15.0139en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectBridge platingen_US
dc.subjectcompartment syndromeen_US
dc.subjectintracompartmental pressureen_US
dc.subjecttibial fractureen_US
dc.titleIntracompartmental pressure changes after anterolateral bridge plating of tibial fracturesen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentKırıkkale Üniversitesien_US
dc.identifier.volume50en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage37en_US
dc.identifier.endpage41en_US
dc.relation.journalActa Orthopaedica Et Traumatologica Turcicaen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster