| dc.description.abstract | As in every religious issue, the two main resources of Islam which are the Qur'an and the Sunnah/hadiths are the first reference sources for deciding the things that are forbidden by Islam. There is no evidence in the Qur'an that suggests specific types of animals are forbidden to eat except pork. Other than pork, only the animals which are slaughtered without the name of Allah, their blood and their carcass are forbidden to consume. Except these restricted ill-gotten meats, in the Qur'anic verses there are no other limitations referring to different animals. However, in Hadith sources there are some narratives referring to the Prophet Muhammad, implying that He named some other forbidden animals beside the ones specified in the Qur'an. Collecting the narratives and evaluating them as a whole will contribute for a better understanding of the rules and principles of prohibitions that the Prophet Muhammad imposed on this issue. Moreover, it will help to identify whether those rulings on some animals are unconditional and world-wide or cause-related and thus changeable according to the conditions. Furthermore, in this matter, although some animals' meat are not mentioned as forbidden in the Qur'an, they are banned by the Prophet Muhammad. This brings the need to highlight the importance of the capacity of the Prophet Muhammad on deciding what is permissible (halal) and forbidden (haram) in the religion. Summary: While the authority for determining what is halal (lawful) and what is haram (forbidden) belongs essentially to Allah, the Prophet Muhammad is also authorized to appoint what is halal-haram by Allah. Authority of the Prophet Muhammad related to the issue is not absolute and stems from the Qur'an. Halal and haram in the Qur'an prescribed by Allah can be included in the concepts of maruf (right) - munkar (wrong) and tayyibat (clean) - hkabais (filthy). It is understood that the Prophet Muhammad grounded his commands in the concept of hkabais. Prohibitions related to animal meats in the Qur'an are limited to four: carcass, blood, pork and animals, which are not slaughtered in the name of Allah. However, in the Hadith resources there are some narratives about the Prophet's prohibition on consuming some types of animals other than the forbidden animals specified in the verses. These narratives can be classified in three titles: 1. Animals, which are prohibited to be eaten. 2. Animals, which are prohibited because of the way they are fed and slaughtered. 3. The matter of prohibition of the animals, which are commanded or forbidden to be slaughtered by the Prophet Muhammad. At the end of the studies conducted based upon hadith resources, in particular Kutub al-Sittah (the well-known six hadith books), it has been discovered that the animals, which are mentioned as not being permissible in the narratives, they are limited to domesticated donkey and the species of "predatory animals, predatory birds", namely wolf, fox and cat. Even though the narratives about hyena imply as eatable, hyena is included in this article as it's a predatory animal. The narratives regarding the prohibition of meat of domesticated donkey were transferred by approximately twenty Companions in respect to the time of the Battle of Khyber. This prohibition is generally stated in the hadith resources as: "We were having dire hunger at the nights of Khyber. When the day for Khyber came, we encountered domesticated donkeys. We immediately slaughtered them. When we put the meat in the pot and started to boil it, crier of the Prophet Muhammad called "Knock over the pots and don't eat any of the donkey meat". Regarding the issue there are such statements of some Companions like "we were banned from eating domesticated donkey", "The Prophet banned the meat of domesticated donkey" among the narratives about the ban. In addition to a large number of narratives about the prohibition of domesticated donkey meat, there are two narratives related to permission of the Prophet for eating domesticated donkey and a narrative that Ibn 'Abbas did not accept the ban. One of the said narratives is not among the narratives in the Kutub al-Sittah while the other one is stated solely in the Sunan of Abu Dawud and thought to be acceptable by the traditionists. Even though this narrative's authenticity is accepted, it is understood that there is an implication for the permission based on a necessity. According to the narrative, Ibn. Abbas referred to 145th verse of the surah al-An'am as a proof to his view saying "What halal is what Allah allowed, what haram is what Allah forbidden and the things about which there is no judgement of Allah are mubah (permissible)". As for us, the fact that Ibn. Abbas did not accepted the prohibition implies that he did not recognize the Prophet's command related to the prohibition as an absolute prohibition. The conveyances of many Companions, which are consistent with each other, about the Prophet's prohibition on eating domesticated donkey during the Battle of Khyber, proved that the prohibition was applied. Even though there is no dispute about prohibiting domesticated donkey, it is controversial whether the prohibition is absolute, constant or provisional based on certain reasons. It is more reasonable to accept that this prohibition was provisional and it was based on certain reasons. Because there are many narratives bearing information that this prohibition was due to several reasons and this is a situation which needs to be considered. Accordingly, there are three reasons, nearly all of which are attributed to judgement of the Companions. These were the facts that domesticated donkey was used in transportation; it used to eat filth and it was slaughtered/consumed without distributing booty/paying taxes. The seeking of the Companions for any reason for this prohibition indicates that they needed to comprehend this prohibition and that the prohibition is not absolute and constant. There is no explanation neither in the resources where the narratives are included nor in the annotation about when, where, why and in which context the prohibition regarding the predatory animals was realized. It is highly possible to assume that the Prophet prohibited these animal as they eat carcass. Another interesting issue within this regard is the fact that there are narratives and views indicating permissibility of eating hyena, which is a predatory, while predatory animals are forbidden in the narratives. Statements of the Prophet related to permissibility of eating hyena, which are considered authentic by traditionists and information about the Arabs who used to eat hyena and some of the Companions who praised eating hyena indicate that urf (custom) has a primary and decisive role about permissibility of eating meats. Regarding this matter about the hyenas, the narratives pointing out some Companions like. A isha bint Abi Bakr and Ibn 'Abbas who viewed prohibition of animals other than the prohibited animals in the Qur'an as inapplicable and other issues referring to the dispute indicate that prohibition of the Prophet Muhammad for predators can not be accepted as an absolute and unquestionable prohibition. Some of the prohibitions mentioned in hadith narratives, except these animals, stem from the way of feeding and slaughtering of some animals. It is understood that consuming meat and milk of the animals that eat filth is prohibited in order to abstain from the things harming human health and mujassam (killing an animal with an arrow, etc. by fastening it as a target) is prohibited as carcass is banned and it is not permissible to torture and harm animals. Some of the prohibitions are related to the some animals, which were allowed and banned to slaughter by the Prophet. As the Prophet commanded some animals to be slaughtered and some animals not, meat of these animals was considered as forbidden. There is a dispute among the scholars, whilst there is not any statement of the Prophet about whether the animals included in this group can be eaten or not. It is seen that the Prophet ordered to slaughter some of the animals and prohibited to slaughter some other animals based on several reasons. | en_US |
