Bayrak, ŞuleSen Tunç, EmineSaroğlu, IşılEğilmez, Türkan2020-06-252020-06-252009Bayrak, Ş.E., Tunç, E.Ş., Saroğlu, I., & Egilmez, T. (2009). Shear bond strengths of different adhesive systems to white mineral trioxide aggregate. Dental materials journal, 28(1), 62-67 .0287-4547https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.28.62https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/4553sonmez, isil/0000-0002-3530-0244; BAYRAK, SULE/0000-0001-7023-2358This study was conducted to compare the shear bond strengths of different adhesive systems to White Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (WMTA). To this end, 40 cylindrical acrylic blocks with a hole in the middle measuring 4 mm diameter X 2 mm height were prepared. The hole was filled with WMTA, and the specimens were allocated into four groups: Group 1 Prime & Bond NT; Group 2 - AdheSE; Group 3 - Xeno III; and Group 4 - Adper Prompt L-Pop. In each group, a different adhesive system and a compomer (Dyract AP) were applied over WMTA. Shear bond strengths were measured using a universal testing machine, and then the data were subjected to one-way ANOVA and Scheffe's post hoc test (p < 0.05). Significantly lowest shear bond strength value was obtained with Adper Prompt L-Pop, whereas Prime & Bond NT revealed higher shear bond strength than the others (p < 0.05). In conclusion, an etch-and-rinse adhesive system which exhibited significantly higher shear bond strength than self-etch adhesive systems - could be a preferred choice when placing compomer materials upon WMTA.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessWMTAShear bond strengthBondingShear bond strengths of different adhesive systems to white mineral trioxide aggregateArticle281626710.4012/dmj.28.622-s2.0-6344909040019280969Q1WOS:000266042600008Q4