Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorAkyol, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorKarahan, Irfan
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-14T18:10:37Z
dc.date.available2021-01-14T18:10:37Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationBu makale açık erişimli değildir.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1878-7649
dc.identifier.issn1878-7657
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-020-00327-w
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/12704
dc.descriptionkarahan, irfan/0000-0003-4669-1751; Akyol, Ahmet/0000-0002-8953-5196en_US
dc.descriptionWOS:000531113700001en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 32385591en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground While sarcopenia is a prevalent disorder that affects muscle mass and quality, patients have limited knowledge of it. On the other hand, patients often use social media to obtain health-specific information. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the YouTube videos about sarcopenia in terms of the knowledge value of what they present and to identify which of them can be considered as the quality sources of such information. Methods The descriptive study included 53 videos retrieved by searching the keywords 'sarcopenia', 'loss of muscle strength', 'sarcopenia treatment,' 'sarcopenia physiotherapy,' and'sarcopenia rehabilitation' on YouTube. The instructive characteristics of the videos were assessed with the Global Quality Scale, by which three quality groups were identified: poor-, moderate-, and high-quality videos. The DISCERN score was utilized to determine reliability. The sources of upload were identified as physicians, non-physician health personnel, health-related websites, universities and academic organizations, patients, and independent users. Finally, the lengths of videos, the number of views, likes, dislikes, and comments, and the DISCERN scores of the videos were compared using group comparisons. Results The results suggested that there were 18 poor-quality, 16 moderate-quality, and 19 high-quality videos. Considering the sources of upload, physicians had the highest ratio in the high-quality group (83.3%). The lengths of videos and the DISCERN scores showed significant differences (p < 0.01). The numbers of views, likes, dislikes, and comments were similar in both quality and source groups. Conclusion Most parts of the videos uploaded by physicians and academic organizations were included in the high-quality group. Overall, according to the results of the study, it can be asserted that high quality may be related to reliability. Furthermore, healthcare professionals and academics should consider using YouTube for increasing knowledge and raising awareness of patients about sarcopenia. Key summary pointsAim To determine the quality and source groups of YouTube videos about sarcopenia knowledge. Findings The most qualified and reliable videos were from physicians and academic organizations. Message The professionals should consider posting videos for increasing awareness about sarcopenia.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSPRINGERen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/s41999-020-00327-wen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectSarcopeniaen_US
dc.subjectSocial mediaen_US
dc.subjectYouTubeen_US
dc.titleIs YouTube a quality source of information on sarcopenia?en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentKKÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume11en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage693en_US
dc.identifier.endpage697en_US
dc.relation.journalEUROPEAN GERIATRIC MEDICINEen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster