Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorAydinli E.
dc.contributor.authorMathews J.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-25T15:13:12Z
dc.date.available2020-06-25T15:13:12Z
dc.date.issued2000
dc.identifier.issn15283577
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/1528-3577.00028
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/1649
dc.description.abstractWhile divisive inter- and intraparadigm debates over theories and methodology abound in the discourse of International Relations, issues surrounding geographically based divides between developed and developing world International Relations scholars have received considerably less attention. Trends of globalization and internationalixation in the past decade have strengthened the argument that such divides must be bridged. This article first investigates whether there have been changes in the level of dialogue between core and periphery IR scholars throughout the 1990s by looking at publishing practices in twenty leading IR journals worldwide over seven years. It suggests explanations for the continuing lack of communication based on interviews with IR scholars from the developing world.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1111/1528-3577.00028en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCore and peripheryen_US
dc.subjectProfessional developmenten_US
dc.subjectPublishingen_US
dc.titleAre the core and periphery irreconcilable? The curious world of publishing in contemporary international relationsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentKırıkkale Üniversitesien_US
dc.identifier.volume1en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage289en_US
dc.identifier.endpage303en_US
dc.relation.journalInternational Studies Perspectivesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster