Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorSoyer, T.
dc.contributor.authorTosun, A.
dc.contributor.authorSomuncu, S.
dc.contributor.authorAydin, G.
dc.contributor.authorAkman, H.
dc.contributor.authorInal, E.
dc.contributor.authorCakmak, M.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-25T17:43:40Z
dc.date.available2020-06-25T17:43:40Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.issn0939-7248
dc.identifier.issn1439-359X
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org10.1055/s-2007-965449
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/3850
dc.descriptionSoyer, Tutku/0000-0003-1505-6042en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000249841500007en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 17806023en_US
dc.description.abstractAim: The aim of the study was the electrophysiological evaluation of the cremasteric reflex after experimental testicular torsion. Material and Methods: Ten male Wistar rats were enrolled into the study. Genitofemoral nerve (GFN) motor conduction and cremasteric reflex (CR) responses were evaluated electrophysiologically after being subjected to anesthesia with intramuscular ketamin hydrochloride. Testicular torsion was performed by rotating the right testicle 720 in a clockwise direction from a mid-scrotal incision. Electrophysiological evaluations were repeated in the early (30 minutes) and late (90 minutes) periods of testicular torsion. Subsequently, detorsion of the testicles was performed and electrophysiological recordings were completed after 60 minutes of detorsion. The CR was also evaluated clinically before each electrophysiological evaluation. The latency and duration of GFN motor conduction and CR responses was compared for base, early torsion, late torsion and detorsion recordings. Friedman's test for repeated measurements was used for statistical analysis. Results: The CR, which was detected clinically before torsion and after detorsion, was not detected during torsion. When base, early torsion, late torsion and detorsion recordings were compared, there was no statistical difference with respect to both latency and duration of GFN motor conduction and CR responses (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Although CR was not detected clinically during testicular torsion, the electrophysiological parameters of the reflex did not differ in the early and late periods of torsion in rats. The GFN motor conduction parameters also showed no differences. In conclusion, the absence of the CR after testicular torsion could not be confirmed by electrophysiological studies.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherGeorg Thieme Verlag Kgen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1055/s-2007-965449en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjecttesticular torsionen_US
dc.subjectcremasteric reflexen_US
dc.subjectelectrophysiologyen_US
dc.titleElectrophysiological evaluation of cremasteric reflex in experimental testicular torsionen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume17en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage261en_US
dc.identifier.endpage265en_US
dc.relation.journalEuropean Journal Of Pediatric Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster