Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorSoyer, Tutku
dc.contributor.authorTosun, Aliye
dc.contributor.authorAydin, Gueluemser
dc.contributor.authorKaya, Murat
dc.contributor.authorArslan, Ayse
dc.contributor.authorOrkun, Sevim
dc.contributor.authorCakmak, Murat
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-25T17:44:27Z
dc.date.available2020-06-25T17:44:27Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.citationclosedAccessen_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-3468
dc.identifier.issn1531-5037
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.11.029
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/4114
dc.descriptionSoyer, Tutku/0000-0003-1505-6042en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000258592500021en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 18675649en_US
dc.description.abstractAim: Inguinoscrotal pathologies are commonly seen in childhood. The genitofemoral nerve (GFN) is responsible for sensitive innervations of scrotal region and the motor innervations of cremasteric muscle. GFN also innervates the afferent and efferent pathways of cremasteric reflex. A prospective study was performed to evaluate the possible relation between inguinoscrotal pathologies and GFN motor functions. Methods: Patients with inguinal hernia, hydrocele, undescended or retractile testicles, aged between 2-12 years were enrolled in the study. Bilateral latency and duration of GFN motor conductions (GFNMC) were obtained electrophysiologically by Surface electrodes. GFNMC recordings of non-pathological sides were assessed as control group. Latency and duration of each group were compared with control group (Mann-Whitney U test). P values lower than .05 were considered significant. Results: Seventy-three electrophysiologic evaluations were investigated in inguinal hernia (n:18), hydrocele (n:9). undescended testicle (n: 14), retractile testicle (n: 12) and control (n:20) groups. There was no age difference between groups and controls. Latency was significantly prolonged in inguinal hernia group when compared with control group (P = .028). Although the latencies were shortened in Undescended testicle group, no significant difference detected (P > .05). Conclusion: Prolonged latencies in inguinal hernia may be a result of nerve trap caused by hernia sac. GFN motor functions showed no causative role in other inguinoscrotal pathologies. It can be also suggested that clinical features of other inguinoscrotal pathologies were not affected by GFN motor functions. Electrophysiological studies in Younger age groups with large number of patients are needed to support our suggestions. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherW B Saunders Co-Elsevier Incen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.11.029en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectgenitofemoral nerveen_US
dc.subjectmotor conductionen_US
dc.subjectinguinoscrotal pathologyen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of genitofemoral nerve motor conduction in inguinoscrotal pathologiesen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentKırıkkale Üniversitesien_US
dc.identifier.volume43en_US
dc.identifier.issue8en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1540en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1542en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal Of Pediatric Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster