Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorCatalbas, Buelent
dc.contributor.authorErcan, Ertugrul
dc.contributor.authorErdemir, Ali
dc.contributor.authorGelgor, Ibrahim Erhan
dc.contributor.authorZorba, Yahya Orcun
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-25T17:48:32Z
dc.date.available2020-06-25T17:48:32Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.issn0003-3219
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.2319/032008-158.1
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/4488
dc.descriptionErdemir, Ali/0000-0003-1140-3887; Erdemir, Ali/0000-0002-6489-9620; ERCAN, Ertugrul/0000-0002-4753-6553; Gelgor, I. Erhan/0000-0003-0859-9874en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000263855600018en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 19216606en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: To test the hypothesis that the application of different chlorhexidine formulations to the etched enamel will not affect shear bond strength (SBS). Materials and Methods: Forty-four freshly extracted human premolars; were collected and stored in distilled water. The teeth were etched with 37% phosphoric and were rinsed and dried. The teeth then were divided into four equal groups. While Group 1 served as a control, Groups 2 to 4 were treated before bonding with a chlorhexidine formulation that included solution (2%), gel (1%), and mouthwash (0.2%). Orthodontic brackets were bonded with Transbond XT (3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif). Bond strength results were evaluated with the use of one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (P < .05) and post hoc tests. Modes of failures were verified by means of scanning electron microscopy. Results: Although no statistically significant difference was observed between Groups 1 and 4 (P > .05), both were statistically superior to Groups 2 and 3 (P < .05). In this in vitro study, the observed measures for Groups 2 and 3 (14.5-10.6 MPa) were lower than those for Groups 1 and 4 (27.3-24.9 MPa), but these values were much higher than those required for clinical use (6-8 MPa). Conclusion: The hypothesis is rejected. The application of chlorhexidine mouth rinse before bonding had no significant effect on the SBS value, and the application of chlorhexidine solution and gel significantly decreased SBS. (Angle Orthod. 2009;79:312-316.)en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherE H Angle Education Research Foundation, Incen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.2319/032008-158.1en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectShear bond strengthen_US
dc.subjectOrthodontic bracketen_US
dc.subjectChlorhexidine gelen_US
dc.subjectARI scoreen_US
dc.titleEffects of Different Chlorhexidine Formulations on Shear Bond Strengths of Orthodontic Bracketsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentKırıkkale Üniversitesien_US
dc.identifier.volume79en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage312en_US
dc.identifier.endpage316en_US
dc.relation.journalAngle Orthodontisten_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster