Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorGocmen, Julide Sedef
dc.contributor.authorBuyukkocak, Unase
dc.contributor.authorCaglayan, Osman
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-25T17:48:45Z
dc.date.available2020-06-25T17:48:45Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.issn0147-958X
dc.identifier.issn1488-2353
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/4549
dc.descriptionWOS: 000207850100003en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 20003827en_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: In vitro antibacterial activity of topical and systemic antihistaminic preparations containing different active substrates against the standard strains of two bacteria was evaluated. Methods: Four topical and 3 systemic preparations containing pheniramine maleate, chlorophenoxamine hydrochloride, and diphenhydramine hydrochloride were studied. The antibacterial activities of these preparations against strains of S. aureus (American Type Culture Collection, ATCC 29213) and S. epidermidis (ATCC 25212) were tested using the disc diffusion method. In addition, the Minimal Innhibitory Concentration (MIC) and Minimal Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) of parenteral preparations for these two bacteria were determined. Results: Pheniramine maleate-topical and pheniramine maleate-systemic had no activity against bacteria, but the others showed various rates of activity. Chlorophenoxamine hydrochloride-topical and chlorophenoxamine hydrochloride-systemic were the most effective (P < 0.05). Despite the same active substrate content, diphenhydramine hydrochloride-topical-1 and diphenhydramine hydrochloride-topical-2 yielded different results when they were compared with each other or with the other preparations. Diphenhydramine hydrochloride-topical-2 had a relatively higher rate of activity than diphenhydramine hydrochloride-topical-1. Inhibition zone diameters were 16.9 +/- 1.5 mm 12.3 +/- 0.5 mm for S. aureus, 17.4 +/- 1.0 mm 0 mm for S. epidermidis respectively (P < 0.05). MIC values of parenteral preparations were equal to or above 125 mu g/ml. Conclusion:, MIC values of parenteral preparations were higher than their blood levels in clinical use. Thus, effects of parenteral preparations may not have been reflected in routine clinical practice. However, topical forms have antibacterial activity due to additive substrates and the use of high concentration levels at the site of application. Therefore, in selection of topical forms for appropriate cases, these effects should also be taken into consideration. The antibacterial activity of topical antihistaminic preparations may be useful in certain dermatological pathology.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherCanadian Soc Clinical Investigationen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleIn vitro antibacterial activity of some systemic and topical antihistaminic preparationsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentKırıkkale Üniversitesien_US
dc.identifier.volume32en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.startpageE232en_US
dc.identifier.endpageE237en_US
dc.relation.journalClinical And Investigative Medicineen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster