| dc.contributor.author | Dalli, M. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bahsi, E. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sahbaz, C. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ince, B. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Akkus, Z. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ercan, E. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Atilgan, S. S. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-06-25T17:49:06Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-06-25T17:49:06Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1310-2818 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1314-3530 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.2478/V10133-010-0072-9 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/4639 | |
| dc.description | ERCAN, Ertugrul/0000-0002-4753-6553 | en_US |
| dc.description | WOS: 000284717900015 | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | This study aimed to perform a comparative assessment of microleakage in Class V cavities among five different composite resins For this purpose 100 fresh caries-free human permanent molars were randomly assigned to one of five groups (n=20) Clearfil Majesty Esthetic + Clearfil S3 Bond (Group I) TPH Spectrum + Xeno V (Group II) Gradia Direct Anterior + G Bond (GC) (Group III) Premise + Optibond All in One (Group IV) and Charisma + iBond (Group V) were applied and polymerized under LED Specimens were varnished immersed in 0 5% methylene and sectioned bucco-palatinally/lingually and microleakage scores were determined Gingival and occlusal microleakage scores among groups were statistically significant (p < 0 05) (p=0 043 p=0 005) Occlusal microleakage scores for Clearfil Majesty Esthetic and Premise were lower than in the other groups Charisma had the highest microleakage scores with no difference among the other groups (p > 0 05) In conclusion occlusal and gingival microleakage scores were satisfactory except for Charisma | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis Ltd | en_US |
| dc.relation.isversionof | 10.2478/V10133-010-0072-9 | en_US |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
| dc.subject | microleakage | en_US |
| dc.subject | different composite resins | en_US |
| dc.subject | self-etching adhesive systems | en_US |
| dc.subject | methylene blue | en_US |
| dc.subject | cervical lesion | en_US |
| dc.title | A COMPARISON OF MICROLEAKAGE SCORES OF FIVE DIFFERENT TYPES OF COMPOSITE RESINS | en_US |
| dc.type | article | en_US |
| dc.contributor.department | Kırıkkale Üniversitesi | en_US |
| dc.identifier.volume | 24 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issue | 4 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 2122 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 2126 | en_US |
| dc.relation.journal | Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment | en_US |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
