Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorUz, Aysun
dc.contributor.authorApaydin, Nihal
dc.contributor.authorCinar, Surhan Ozer
dc.contributor.authorApan, Alpaslan
dc.contributor.authorComert, Baris
dc.contributor.authorTubbs, R. Shane
dc.contributor.authorLoukas, Marios
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-25T17:49:08Z
dc.date.available2020-06-25T17:49:08Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.issn1279-8517
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-010-0642-4
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/4644
dc.descriptionCinar, Ayse Surhan/0000-0003-2247-9764; Apaydin, Nihal/0000-0002-7680-1766en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000284856500009en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 20204637en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground Sciatic nerve block is a commonly used technique for providing anesthesia and analgesia to the lower extremity. It is classically performed through posterior or lateral approaches. However, an anterior approach should be considered in certain conditions where patient positioning would be complicated. The success rate of the sciatic nerve block with previously defined approaches has been reported to be low, however, the complication rate with such approaches has been found to be high. Therefore, we aimed to conduct an anatomical study defining a new anterior approach to block the sciatic nerve and also to examine if the femoral nerve can be blocked via the same approach. Methods Initially, various landmarks and practical measurements were examined on 11 lower extremities. Eight of the lower extremities were used for defining the best approach to the sciatic nerve anteriorly. Once defined, Indian ink was injected into two cadaveric extremities with an anesthetic needle through such an approach. The route of the needle was evaluated via dissection and we observed whether the ink stained the sciatic nerve or injured regional neurovascular structures. The remaining extremity was cut axially to observe the route of the needle after injection. Results The ideal site of needle insertion was found to be 4-5 cm distal to the inguinal crease and 1-2 cm lateral to the femoral artery. On average, this point corresponded to a point located 8.0 +/- 0.7 cm distal to a perpendicular line drawn midway through the straight line connecting the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) and the pubic tubercle (PT). The distance of this point to the straight line drawn between the ASIS and PT was approximately equal to half the distance of this line. Conclusion The technique described herein appears anatomically safe with a lower risk of damage to major neurovascular structures. Additionally, the femoral nerve can be blocked simultaneously to obtain a larger area of anesthesia of the lower limb.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Franceen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/s00276-010-0642-4en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectSciatic nerve blocken_US
dc.subjectFemoral nerve blocken_US
dc.subjectAnterior approachen_US
dc.titleA novel approach for anterior sciatic nerve block: cadaveric feasibility studyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentKırıkkale Üniversitesien_US
dc.identifier.volume32en_US
dc.identifier.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.startpage873en_US
dc.identifier.endpage878en_US
dc.relation.journalSurgical And Radiologic Anatomyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster