Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorZorba, Yahya Orcun
dc.contributor.authorErdemir, Ali
dc.contributor.authorTurkyilmaz, Ali
dc.contributor.authorEldeniz, Ayce Uonverdi
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-25T17:49:17Z
dc.date.available2020-06-25T17:49:17Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citationBu makale açık erişimli değildir.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0099-2399
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.04.026
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/4682
dc.descriptionErdemir, Ali/0000-0002-6489-9620; Erdemir, Ali/0000-0003-1140-3887en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000281657100015en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 20728720en_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of different curing units and 2 luting cements on the push-out bond strength of a translucent fiber post. Methods: Thirty maxillary incisor roots were endodontically treated. Post spaces were prepared, and the smear layers were removed. Posts (FRC Postec Plus) were luted with either a self-etch cement (Panavia F 2.0) or a self-adhesive cement (Maxcem). Luting agents were then light-activated with a quartz-tungsten-halogen, a blue light emitting diode, or a plasma-arc curing unit. Roots/cemented posts were transversally sectioned from coronal to apical. Push-out tests were performed, and data were analyzed by using three-way analysis of variance and Tukey tests. Results: Push-out bond strengths were significantly affected by the type of luting agent (P < .05) and root region (P < .05). The type of light source used in curing did not affect push-out bond strengths (P > .05). Conclusions: Self-adhesive resin cement provided higher bond strength than the self-etch cement when smear layer was removed before the post cementation. The push-out bond strength in the apical portion of the root was significantly lower than in the coronal region. The use of different curing units in the photoirradiation of dual-cured resin cement did not affect the retention of the fiber post as a result of the limited light transmission capability of this post. (J Endod 2010;36:1521-1525)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipKirikkale University Scientific Project Research Foundation, TurkeyKirikkale University; Selcuk University, Scientific Research Project Coordination CenterSelcuk Universityen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by a grant-in-aid (2007-17) from the Kirikkale University Scientific Project Research Foundation, Turkey. This study was also partially supported by a grant given by Selcuk University, Scientific Research Project Coordination Center and conducted in the Research Laboratories of Faculty of Dentistry.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Science Incen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.joen.2010.04.026en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCuring unitsen_US
dc.subjectluting agentsen_US
dc.subjectpush out bond strengthen_US
dc.titleEffects of Different Curing Units and Luting Agents on Push-out Bond Strength of Translucent Postsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentKırıkkale Üniversitesien_US
dc.identifier.volume36en_US
dc.identifier.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1521en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1525en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal Of Endodonticsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster