Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorGenc, Gulsum Aydan
dc.contributor.authorKonukseven, Ozlem
dc.contributor.authorMuluk, Nuray Bayar
dc.contributor.authorKirkim, Gunay
dc.contributor.authorBasar, Figen Suren
dc.contributor.authorTuncer, Ulku
dc.contributor.authorBelgin, Erol
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-25T18:07:16Z
dc.date.available2020-06-25T18:07:16Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationclosedAccessen_US
dc.identifier.issn0385-8146
dc.identifier.issn1879-1476
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2012.09.003
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/5531
dc.descriptionWOS: 000317998800002en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 23099038en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: Newborn hearing screening (NHS) works well for babies with bilateral hearing loss. However, for those with unilateral loss, it has yet to be established some standard rules like age of diagnose, risk factors, hearing loss degree. The aim of this study is to identify the demographic characteristics of newborns with unilateral hearing loss to obtain evidence based data in order to see what to be done for children with unilateral hearing loss (UHL). Method: Newborn hearing screening data of 123 babies with unilateral hearing loss, 71 (57.7%) male and 52 (42.3%) female, were investigated retrospectively. Data provided from the archives of six referral tertiary audiology centers from four regions in Turkey. Data, including type of hearing loss; age of diagnosis; prenatal, natal and postnatal risk factors; familial HL and parental consanguinity was analyzed in all regions and each of the Regions 1-4 separately. Result: The difference between data obtained in terms of gender and type of hearing loss was detected as statistically significant (p < 0.05). While UHL was significantly higher in females at Region I, and in males at other Regions of 2-4; SNHL was the most detected type of UHL in all regions with the rate of 82.9-100.0%. There were not significant differences between regions in terms of the degree of hearing loss, presence of risk factors, family history of hearing loss, age at diagnosis and parental consanguinity (p > 0.05). Diagnosis procedure was completed mostly at 3-6 months in Region 4; whereas, in other regions (Regions 1-3), completion of procedure was delayed until 6 months-1 year. Conclusion: This study indicates that the effect of postnatal risk factors, i.e. curable hyperbilirubinemia, congenital infection and intensive care is relatively high on unilateral hearing loss, precautions should be taken regarding their prevention, as well as physicians and other health personnel should be trained in terms of these risks. For early and timely diagnosis, families will be informed about hearing loss and NHS programme; will be supported, including financial support of diagnosis process. By dissemination of the NHS programme to the total of country by high participation rate, risk factors can be determined better and measures can be increased. Additionally, further studies are needed with more comprehensive standard broad data for more evidence based consensus. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Sci Ltden_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.anl.2012.09.003en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectNewborn hearing screening (NHS) programmeen_US
dc.subjectUnilateral hearing loss (UHL)en_US
dc.subjectRisk factorsen_US
dc.subjectConsanguinityen_US
dc.subjectFamilial hearing lossen_US
dc.titleFeatures of unilateral hearing loss detected by newborn hearing screening programme in different regions of Turkeyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentKırıkkale Üniversitesien_US
dc.identifier.volume40en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage251en_US
dc.identifier.endpage259en_US
dc.relation.journalAuris Nasus Larynxen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster