Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorSari, Elif
dc.contributor.authorSimsek, Gokce
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-25T18:12:38Z
dc.date.available2020-06-25T18:12:38Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.issn0364-216X
dc.identifier.issn1432-5241
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-015-0565-x
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/5989
dc.descriptionSIMSEK, GOKCE/0000-0001-5281-0986en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000365305800005en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 26395094en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground Pain, ecchymosis, and edema are major postoperative transient complications of septorhinoplasty procedures. They increase the patient's anxiety and decrease satisfaction levels as well as extend recovery time in the early postoperative period. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of total nasal block (TNB) and central facial block (CFB) on postoperative pain, edema, and ecchymosis. Methods A total of 60 consecutive patients enrolled in this study and were divided into three groups as Controls (n = 20), TNB (n = 20), and CFB (n = 20). The two block methods mentioned above were performed at both the beginning and end of the surgery in the TNB and CFB groups. The Control group was not subjected to any block methods. Pain, edema, and ecchymosis score results according to the three scales were recorded postoperatively after 24 h, and on days 2, 5, 7, and 10. Results were analyzed statistically. Results Of all patients, 28 were male and 32 were female. Ages were between 18 and 52 years (mean = 26.3 years). Pain, edema, and ecchymosis scores were significantly lower in the TNB and CFB groups than in the Control group. Additionally, there was a significant difference between the TNB and CFB groups in terms of pain and edema at postoperative 24 h and on day 2. Ecchymosis scores were lower in the CFB group than in the TNB group at 24 h and on days 2 and 5 after the operation. Conclusion Both TNB and CFB decreased postoperative pain, edema, and ecchymosis in septorhinoplasty. However, CFB was more effective than TNB in terms of pain, edema, and ecchymosis relief after septorhinoplasty procedures. Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/s00266-015-0565-xen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectSeptorhinoplastyen_US
dc.subjectRhinoplastyen_US
dc.subjectPostoperative painen_US
dc.subjectEdemaen_US
dc.subjectEcchymosisen_US
dc.titleComparison of the Effects of Total Nasal Block and Central Facial Block on Acute Postoperative Pain, Edema, and Ecchymosis After Septorhinoplastyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentKırıkkale Üniversitesien_US
dc.identifier.volume39en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.startpage877en_US
dc.identifier.endpage880en_US
dc.relation.journalAesthetic Plastic Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster