Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorBasalan, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorCetinkaya, A. Volkan
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-25T18:30:18Z
dc.date.available2020-06-25T18:30:18Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationclosedAccessen_US
dc.identifier.issn0021-8812
dc.identifier.issn1525-3163
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/7611
dc.descriptionWOS: 000507409900168en_US
dc.description.abstractStudy was conducted to determine the adaptability of ryegrass to the ration of ruminants in central region of Turkey. Both ryegrass and alfalfa were planted in Cankiri and Corum cities which are located in similar geographic and climatic conditions. Forage samples were obtained during second, third and fourth harvesting times. in each sample, dry matter (DM), crude fat (EE), crude protein (CP), crude ash (CA), crude cellulose (CS), acid detergent fiber (ADF) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) levels were determined based on AOAC methods. Metabolizable Energy levels of both ryegrass and alfalfa were calculated. In vitro disappearance of dry matter was measured by incubation of dacron bags in rumen fluid for 72 hours in Ankom® daisy incubator and extent of disappearance were determined. Generalized linear model was applied to analyze data and means were separated by using LSD. Although dry matter levels were similar (P > 0,05), ash and fat levels were significantly higher in ryegrass than those in alfalfa (P < 0,05). Additionally, as it was expected, crude protein content of ryegrass was significantly lower than that of alfalfa (P < 0,05). NDF contents of both feeds were similar and ADF levels of alfalfa were slightly higher in only second harvest date. Metabolizable energy levels of ryegrass in all harvested times were statistically higher than those in all harvested dates in alfalfa (P < 0,05). DM disappearance of ryegrass was significantly higher than that of alfalfa (P < 0,05). In conclusion, ryegrass may have some advantages in regions with limited forage sources. Additionally it may be alternative or substitute to the traditional small grain forages. Further research needed to show those advantages of ryegrass in nutrients to extrapolate consumption preferences or performance of beef or dairy cattle.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherOxford Univ Press Incen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectryegrassen_US
dc.subjectalfalfaen_US
dc.subjectnutrientsen_US
dc.titleComparison of nutrients and in vitro degradability of ryegrass (Lolium Multiforum L.) and alfalfa (Medicago Sativa L.) in central region of Turkeyen_US
dc.typeconferenceObjecten_US
dc.contributor.departmentKırıkkale Üniversitesien_US
dc.identifier.volume97en_US
dc.identifier.startpage89en_US
dc.identifier.endpage89en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal Of Animal Scienceen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster