Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorDalkiran, Tahir
dc.contributor.authorKandur, Yasar
dc.contributor.authorDagoglu, Besra
dc.contributor.authorSaki, Hatice
dc.contributor.authorGungor, Sukru
dc.contributor.authorIpek, Sevcan
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-25T18:35:02Z
dc.date.available2020-06-25T18:35:02Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationDalkiran, T., Kandur, Y., Dagoglu, B., Saki, H.,Gungor Ş. & Ipek, S. (2020) The comparison of the resistivity index values in the ultrasonographic evaluation of a unilateral atrophic/hypoplastic kidney, Renal Failure, 42:1, 289-293.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0886-022X
dc.identifier.issn1525-6049
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/0886022X.2020.1743720
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/8104
dc.descriptionWOS: 000521274900001en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 32208786en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: In the study, we aimed to determine the sensitivity of the renal resistivity index (RI) in differentiating hypoplastic and atrophic kidneys in patients with small-sized kidneys, and to evaluate its capacity to predict the renal involvement confirmed by the DMSA scintigraphy. Material and methods: We retrospectively reviewed the ultrasonography (US) and DMSA findings, and medical records of pediatric patients with unilateral diminutive kidneys followed between January 2017 and June 2018. The RI measurements were performed twice, and the mean RI was calculated for each kidney of all patients. Results: Sixty-three (male/female, m/f = 28/35) pediatric patients aged 107.2 +/- 49.4 months (range 14-206 months) were included in this study. The DMSA scintigraphy revealed abnormal changes to atrophic kidneys in 38 patients and hypoplastic kidneys in 25. There were no differences between the groups with atrophy and hypoplasia by age, gender, urine density, and creatinine. The patient group with atrophic kidneys had a mean RI of 0.55 +/- 0.21, and patients with hypoplastic kidneys had a mean RI of 0.67 +/- 0.03. The mean RI and systolic/diastolic rates of the patients with atrophy were significantly lower than of the patients with hypoplastic kidneys (p = 0.042 and p = 0.048, respectively). There was a positive correlation between RI and DFR in the group with atrophy (r = 0.461, p = 0.016), but this was not the case for the group with hypoplastic kidneys (r= -0.066, p = 0.889). Conclusions: The resistivity index might be very useful for differentiating atrophy and hypoplasia in patients with unilateral small kidneys and can be used instead of scintigraphic evaluation.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1080/0886022X.2020.1743720en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectResistivity indexen_US
dc.subjectunilateralen_US
dc.subjectatrophyen_US
dc.subjecthypoplastic kidneyen_US
dc.titleThe comparison of the resistivity index values in the ultrasonographic evaluation of a unilateral atrophic/hypoplastic kidneyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentKırıkkale Üniversitesien_US
dc.identifier.volume42en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage289en_US
dc.identifier.endpage293en_US
dc.relation.journalRenal Failureen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster