Yazar "Aljaad, Anas" seçeneğine göre listele

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
  • [ X ]
    Öğe
    THE RULES THAT İNFERRED ABOUT THE SEPERATE TWO SUFYANS EACH OTHER FROM İBN HÂCER EL-ASKALÂNÎ’S WORK CALLED FETHU’L-BÂRÎ
    (Kırıkkale Üniversitesi, 2018) Aljaad, Anas
    Thereare no common rules among hadith transmitters about mentioning the namesin isn?d. Sometimes, they mention only the transmitter’s name or hisfather’s name or both. Sometimes, they confine oneself to telling only name andtag. Sometimes they mention the transmitter and his father’s full name. Andsometimes they mention the name of transmitter’s grandfather and his nickname.All this much available in Hadith books but those names are repeated many timesbecause of their ampleness. We sometimes can see that the name only, sometimeswith father’s name and sometimes with nickname. Therefore, we feel the need ofsomething that to distinguish the transmitters name from other names. If a namecannot be distinguished from the other names, scholars called this name as “mühmel”.The distinguishing of “mühmel” names are requiring another wisdom andknowledge. There are simple mühmel names and difficult mühmelnames. It is simple the distinguish that if a name called/accepted as a mühmelname because of the difference between the schedule of hadith, as in thiscase it is understandable the schedule that which the transmitter belonging to.There are two sections for transmitters who are in the same schedule, or who islived in the same century: 1. Who become different by in teacher and instudent. It is simple to distinguish them each other by looking the teacher andhis students. In this way, it is simply understandable the transmittersidentity. 2. Who become the same by in teacher and in student. The distinguishinghere is very difficult if the transmitter did not distinguish them. Becauseresearcher needs to find some evidence for distinguish the transmitter fromothers. If there are two transmitters who called by same name and one of themweak, and the other is reliable, the distinguishing those two isnecessary.  Because, adjudging a hadithis depends on the transmitter’s identity. By the transmitter’s identity, daif(weak) hadith and sahih (correct) hadith can be distinguish each other. Ifthose two transmitters (both of them) are reliable, then the other criteria beexamined. For instance, looking at being incompletely transmitted or fraud.Therefore, the researcher can identify the transmitter’s idendity, and canadjudge the hadith. Hence this second section is more difficult from the otherone. Because we are talking about the transmitter that lived in the samecentury and his teacher and his students similar with others. Our work is aboutthis second section. As a sapmle, we will examine Sufyân b. Uyeyne and Sufyanb. Sa’id es-Sevrî. This two are arbiters about the defective (ma’lul) hadith’s,transmitters and law (fıqh). So, it is important the mentioning them because ofmodification the left out transmitter’s name. They are transmitted many hadithand these hadiths are be in the Kutub-u Sitte (The Six Standard Collections).The transmitters that reported hadith from those two, are mentioning theirnames unconditionally. Many scholars are make effort to distinguish their namesin hadith expounds. If one of them be in isnad, the scholars recorded his nameas like: Sufyan (Sevrî – Ibn Uyeyne). İbn Hâcer el-Askalânî is one of theexpounder that make effort about this subject. His famous work of expound isone of the Bukhari expound called Fethu’l-Bârî. In his work Fethu’l-Bârî, İbnHâcer has distinguish Sufyân b. Uyeyne and Sufyan b. Sa’id es-Sevrî from eachother. When he had distinguished them, he also point out the reasons of preferone to the other. As a researcher, we gathered and examined those reasons thatİbn Hâcer pointed out. Indeed, this reasons and rules although concentrate thistwo, also important for to determining the other mühmel names. Thenumber of this reasons and rules is fourteen.