Yazar "Almaz M.E." seçeneğine göre listele
Listeleniyor 1 - 2 / 2
Sayfa Başına Sonuç
Sıralama seçenekleri
Öğe Evaluation of push-out bond strength of a new MTA-based sealer(2013) Sönmez I.Ş.; Sönmez D.; Almaz M.E.Aim: To evaluate the push-out bond strength of MTA Fillapex (Angelus) and compare it with ProRoot MTA (Dentsply) and AH Plus (Dentsply). Design: Thirty extracted single-rooted teeth were selected and prepared using a rotary system. The samples were divided randomly into three groups (n = 10) and obturated, respectively, with: (1) AH Plus + gutta-percha (DiaDent); (2) MTA Fillapex + gutta-percha; (3) ProRoot MTA. Each root was sectioned into 1-mm-thick slices and 30 samples for each group were obtained. The samples were subjected to push-out test. Failure modes were examined under 30× magnification. The results were analysed statistically by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test. Results: Mean push-out bond strength values were ranked as follows: ProRoot MTA > AH Plus > MTA Fillapex. Statistically significant differences were found among all groups (p < 0.05). Conclusion: ProRoot MTA had the highest bond strength, whilst MTA Fillapex displayed the lowest values among the groups. © 2013 European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry.Öğe In vitro evaluation of apical microleakage of a new MTA-based sealer(Springer Verlag, 2012) Sönmez I.S.; Oba A.A.; Sönmez D.; Almaz M.E.Aim: To evaluate the apical microleakage of a new MTA-based sealer; MTA Fillapex (Angelus) and compare it with ProRoot MTA (Dentsply) and AH Plus (Dentsply). METHODS: 51 single-rooted permanent teeth were selected and the roots were prepared using a rotary system. The samples were divided randomly into 3 groups (n=15). Six roots were used as positive and negative controls. The teeth were obturated with respectively; A. AH Plus and gutta percha (DiaDent); B. MTA Fillapex and gutta percha; C. ProRoot MTA. Specimens were placed in 2% methylene blue dye for 72h. Then linear dye penetration was measured. Measurements were analysed statistically. RESULTS: MTA Fillapex group had significantly higher microleakage values (p<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between MTA and AH Plus groups (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: The sealing ability of AH Plus and MTA were similar whilst MTA Fillapex showed more microleakage than the other two materials.