Yazar "Goncuoglu, Alper" seçeneğine göre listele

Listeleniyor 1 - 2 / 2
  • [ X ]
    Öğe
    Evaluation of putamen area and cerebral peduncle with surrounding cistern in patients with Parkinson's disease: is there a difference from controls in cranial MRI?
    (Taylor & Francis Ltd, 2024) Say, Bahar; Muluk, Nuray Bayar; Inal, Mikail; Goncuoglu, Alper; Yorubulut, Serap; Ergun, Ufuk
    Objectives Nigrostriatal dopaminergic neuron loss is essential in pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease (PD). The purpose of this study was to evaluate nigrostriatal structures including the putamen, cerebral peduncle, widths of interpeduncular cistern, and ambient cistern around the midbrain with conventional cranial magnetic resonance images (MRI) in patients with PD.Methods The MRI of 56 subjects was included, which was selected from the radiological data system for this retrospective study. The 29 patients with idiopathic PD were included and their disease duration, Hoehn&Yahr stage, and Levodopa equivalent dose (LED) were recorded. The 27 controls had a normal neurologic examination and cranial MRI. All subjects in the patient and control groups had right-hand dominance. Putamen and cerebral peduncle areas and widths of interpeduncular and ambient cisterns were measured in T2 sequences of MRI. Further statistical analysis was applied to exclude gender and age effect on areas.Results The areas of putamen and cerebral peduncles were significantly reduced in patients with PD compared to the control bilaterally (p < 0.001). Enlargement of interpeduncular and ambient cisterns in patients was higher than in controls, and it was significant (p < 0.001). A correlation was not observed between measurement results and clinical characteristics of patients with PD. Only the cerebral peduncle area/ambient cistern width ratio was significantly correlated with disease duration positively (right r = 0.46 p = 0.012, left r = 0.389 p = 0.037).Conclusion Clinicians should be careful with conventional MRIs of patients with idiopathic PD in practice. It may be different from controls without any neurological disorder, particularly putamen, cerebral peduncles, interpeduncular, and ambient cisterns.
  • [ X ]
    Öğe
    Interobserver Agreement in the Analysis of Different Radiological Classifications of COVID-19 on Computed Tomography
    (Galenos Publ House, 2021) Ozdemir, Adnan; Yilmaz, Sevda; Erol, Ozlem Ozluk; Kaygusuz, Sedat; Goncuoglu, Alper; Erkmen, Selmin Perihan Komurcu; Karahan, Irfan
    Introduction: Computed tomography (CT) has approximately 98% sensitivity for Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). Various algorithms were designed using CT images. However, the interobserver agreement of different radiological classifications of COVID-19 is not yet known. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the interobserver agreement of different radiological classifications of COVID-19. Materials and Methods: This study included 212 patients who were positive on the polymerase chain reaction test and eligible for CT. Four radiologists examined all CT images simultaneously. They reached a consensus that CT images can provide definite findings of COVID-19. The Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) consensus statement, the British Society of Thoracic Imaging (BSTI) structured reporting statement, and COVID-19 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) were used. Fleiss' Kappa was used to detect interobserver agreement. Kappa values of 0.000.20 were considered as slight, 0.21-0.40 as fair, 0.41-0.60 as moderate, 0.61-0.80 as substantial, and 0.81-1.00 as near-perfect agreement, and p<0.05 was accepted as significant. Results: A total of 137 patients did not have any pathological CT findings. The most prevalent radiological findings were ground-glass opacities and consolidations. The agreements on all classifications were at near-perfect levels: RSNA, 0.86 (0.82-0.90); BSTI, 0.83 (0.79-0.87), and CO-RADS, 0.82 (0.79-0.86). The RSNA classification has the highest consistency rate, followed by BSTI and CO-RADS. However, substantial and moderate agreements were found in the subcategories of each classification. Conclusion: In this study, some subcategories had a lower agreement, despite the high consistency rates for COVID-19 radiological classification systems in the literature. Therefore, improving the items without consensus can lead to the development of better radiological diagnostic approaches.