Yazar "Karadağ, Ayşe Serap" seçeneğine göre listele
Listeleniyor 1 - 2 / 2
Sayfa Başına Sonuç
Sıralama seçenekleri
Öğe Alteration of tissue expression of human beta defensin-1 and human beta defensin-2 in psoriasis vulgaris following phototherapy(Taylor & Francis Ltd, 2020) Uzunçakmak, Tuğba Kevser; Karadağ, Ayşe Serap; Özkanlı, Şeyma; Akbulak, Özge; Özlü, Emin; Akdeniz, Necmettin; Oğuztüzün, SerpilWe compared the expression profiles of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) in psoriatic skin before and after narrow band ultraviolet B (nb-UVB) phototherapy and compared the levels to healthy controls. We studied 15 male and 12 female patients with psoriasis vulgaris, and 11 female and nine male control individuals. The patient group was treated with 24-36 sessions of nb-UVB phototherapy. Immunohistochemical staining for human beta defensin 1 (hBD-1) and human beta defensin 2 (hBD-2) expression of lesioned and control skin was performed prior to and following phototherapy. After phototherapy, the psoriatic area and severity index (PASI) decreased significantly in the treated patients compared to controls. The hBD-1 level was significantly higher in psoriasis patients than healthy controls. We found no statistically significant difference in hBD-1 and hBD 2 levels before and after phototherapy in the patient group. Although hBD-1 plays a role in psoriasis, levels of human beta defensin 1 and 2 are not affected significantly by phototherapy.Öğe Evaluation of tissue levels of glutathione S-transferases (GST) isoenzymes in patients with discoid lupus erythematosus(2019) Yavuz, İbrahim Halil; Yavuz, Göknur Özaydın; Erten, Remzi; Bilgili, Serap Güneş; Karadağ, Ayşe Serap; Oğuztüzün, SerpilAim: Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) has a multifactorial pathogenesis involving genetic and environmental triggers and congenital and acquired immune response. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of Glutathione S-Transferases (GST) isoenzymes including GSTT1, GSTM1, and GSTP1 in the CLE patients with an etiology of solar radiation exposure.Material and Methods: Paraffin-embedded skin biopsy sections from the patients were stained by immunohistochemical methods. The results were evaluated under a light microscope by a pathologist. The pattern, localization, and distribution of the immunohistochemical staining were recorded for each patient. Staining of the nucleus or cytoplasm was considered as positive staining. The accuracy of staining was determined based on the intensity and percentage of staining.Results: No significant difference was found between the patient and control groups regarding staining intensity. In terms of staining percentage, the prevalence of GSTP1-3 genotype was significantly lower in the patient group compared to the control group (25% vs. 63.33%) (p0.002).Conclusion: No significant difference was observed in the staining intensity of GSTP1, GSTT1, and GSTM1 between the patient and control groups and the staining percentage in some genotypes was even higher in the control group compared to the patient group.