Yazar "Oguz, Oguzhan" seçeneğine göre listele
Listeleniyor 1 - 3 / 3
Sayfa Başına Sonuç
Sıralama seçenekleri
Öğe Comparison of 1 Year Nasal Tip Projection Results of Triple Cartilage Combining Suture (Flexible Tongue-in-Groove) and Classical Tongue-in-Groove Techniques(Sage Publications Inc, 2024) Bafaqeeh, Sameer Ali; Muluk, Nuray Bayar; Ozturk, Zeynel; Oguz, Oguzhan; Altiner, Halil Ibrahim; Cingi, CemalObjectives: In the present study, we compared patient satisfaction with classical tongue-in-groove (TIG) technique and triple cartilage combining suture (TCCS; flexible tongue-in-groove) techniques applied to the nasal tip in rhinoplasty. Methods: In this retrospective study, 80 patients who underwent rhinoplasty operations with TIG or TCCS techniques applied to the tip region were included. There were 40 patients in both groups. All patients in groups 1 and 2 were evaluated by the criteria written below at preoperative, postoperative first month, and postoperative first year: (1) Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation Questionnaire (ROE), (2) tip projection (cm), (3) nasal dorsum length (cm), (4) tip projection ratio (Goode), (5) nasofrontal angle, and (6) nasolabial angle. Results: The patients were followed up at 84.32 +/- 19.38 months in the TIG group and 87.47 +/- 18.01 months in the TCCS group. Our results showed that preoperative, postoperative first-month, and first-year tip projection (P = .013, P = .022, and P = .020, respectively), and nasal dorsum length values (P = .009, P = .020, and P = .020, respectively) of the TCCS group were significantly lower than those in the TIG group. There was a positive correlation between the postoperative first month and postoperative first year ROE scores. Lower preoperative tip projection ratio (Goode) values and higher nasolabial angle values were related to higher ROE scores showing patient satisfaction. Conclusion: For the patient satisfaction after tip rhinoplasty, lower projection ratio (Goode) and higher nasolabial angle values were related to ROE scores. Although there are no significant results, lower tip projection results in the TCCS group may be related to more patient satisfaction due to natural appearance.Öğe Facial mask for prevention of allergic rhinitis symptoms(Frontiers Media Sa, 2023) Oguz, Oguzhan; Manole, Felicia; Bayar Muluk, Nuray; Cingi, CemalObjectivesWe reviewed the role of facial masks in preventing allergic rhinitis (AR) symptoms.MethodsThe literature survey was performed in PubMed, EBSCO, UpToDate, and Proquest Central databases of Kirikkale University and Google and Google Scholar databases.ResultsAeroallergens are microscopic airborne particles that trigger AR symptoms. In sensitive people, the type 1 hypersensitivity reaction against these allergens occurs when these microparticles enter the nasal mucosa via inhalation. Pollens, molds, dust mites, and animal dander are only some of the allergens suspected of contributing to AR symptoms. The treatment guidelines for AR extensively encompass allergy avoidance and environmental management as the first-line treatment. It is recommended that those who experience seasonal symptoms try to avoid their triggers whenever possible. While medical masks filter out particles larger than 3 mu m, FFP2 masks are effective against particles as small as 0.004 mu m. Since both mask types are effective in filtering pollen larger than 5 mu m in size, they can be used to prevent pollen exposure. The antiviral protection provided by medical and FFP2 masks to hospital employees is roughly equivalent. Thus, both should be effective against direct local (eye) or indirect inhaled (nose, bronchial) pollen exposure. For the masks to do their job, they need to fit correctly.ConclusionFace mask affects AR patients' quality of life and reduces AR symptoms' severity.Öğe Investigation of the Effects of Allicin on the Nasal Mucosa(Sage Publications Inc, 2024) Ozturk, Zeynel; Muluk, Nuray Bayar; Oguz, Oguzhan; Pinarbasli, Mehmet Ozgur; Gungor, Enes; Arik, Deniz; Bal, CengizObjectives: We investigated the effects of allicin on nasal mucosa via an experimental study. Methods: In the study, 16 male New Zealand Albino (2.5-4.5 kg) rabbits were used. The right nasal passages of the 8 rabbits were included in the control group (Group 1, n = 8), and the right nasal passages of the 8 different rabbits were included in the study group (Group 2, n = 8). In the study group (Group 2), a Merocel tampon soaked in Allicin (Alli Tech; Dulwich Health) (0.5 mg/kg). In the control group (Group 1), a Merocel tampon soaked in serum physiologic was placed in the right nasal passage for 3 days (first to third days of the study). On the fourth day, nasal mucosa was excised and histopathological examinations were performed. Results: Our results showed that there were no significant differences in terms of bleeding, congestion, inflammation, calcification, and seromucous gland density between the study and control groups (P > .05). In light microscopic evaluation, moderate density of lymphocytic cells beneath the surface epithelium and, further down, seromucous gland structures, dense seromucous glands, and occasional ductal structures were observed in the study group. Congested vascular structures beneath the respiratory epithelium and adjacent to a thick-walled vascular structure, coarse calcification is observed in the control group. Conclusion: It has been demonstrated that the Allicin-soaked Merocel pack does not have adverse effects on rabbit nasal mucosa, and it does not lead to mucosal bleeding, congestion, inflammation, and calcification, and changes in the seromucous gland density. Considering the antibacterial and antiviral effects of allicin, it is appropriate to plan research in humans to evaluate its use in nasal packs applied during epistaxis, septoplasty, rhinoplasty, and endoscopic sinus surgery.