Yazar "Onder, M. Ercument" seçeneğine göre listele
Listeleniyor 1 - 3 / 3
Sayfa Başına Sonuç
Sıralama seçenekleri
Öğe Allogenic versus Autogenous Bone Rings in Dental Implant Surgery: Guidance of Stress Analysis-Part II(Amer Scientific Publishers, 2018) Ozgul, Ozkan; Altay, Berkan; Atil, Fethi; Onder, M. Ercument; Tekin, Umut; Yilmaz, Seda; Kocyigit, Ismail DorukObjective The aim of this study is to compare the stress distribution along the alveolar bone following the allogenic and autogenous bone ring assisted immediate dental implant surgery using three dimensional finite element analyses Material and Methods Finite element models of maxilla and mandible that augmented with autogenous and allogenic bone ring graft with dental implant were created Vertical force of 100 N and oblique force of 100 N at 45(degrees) angle were applied to root formed design dental implant and abutment Results The highest calculated values of VonMisses (VM) stresses were observed in oblique loaded mandible model which augmented with allogenic graft In all models the highest VM stress values were greater for oblique loading compare to vertical loadings Allogenic bone ring grafts contribute the stresses more evenly through the implant, as for the autogenous grafts stresses are concentrated in the neck area of the implant Discussion Allogenic and autogenous grafts applied with implant placement create different stress distributions Stress distributions should be considered when choosing type of biomaterial.Öğe Effect of Locally Administered Alendronate on Onlay Grafts(Amer Scientific Publishers, 2017) Tekin, Umut; Ozgul, Ozkan; Tuz, Hakan; Korkusuz, Petek; Kocyigit, Ismail Doruk; Atil, Fethi; Onder, M. ErcumentObjective: The present study compared the effects of local alendronate application on the osteogenesis of autogenous and xenogenous onlay grafts implanted in rabbit mandibles. Material and Methods: 28 New Zealand rabbits were used in this experimental animal study. The animals were randomly divided into 4 groups according to graft material as follows: D1: autogenous graft-saline; D2: 60% autogenous graft-40% alendronate D3: xenogenous bone graft-saline; D4: 60% xenogenous graft-40% alendronate. 3 histologic parameters were evaluated: the ratio of new bone formation to the total defect area, the active osteoblast-lined bone length, and the ratio of osteocyte-filled lacunae to total lacunae. At the same time, the grafted zones were evaluated using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and the Bone mineral density scores were measured. Results: The present study showed better results for the group receiving alendronate applied to autogenous graft when compared to other groups. Discussion: The administration of alendronate increases the resistance of autogenous graft; it may also enhance new bone formation and increase the viability of xenograft. Further animal studies supported with biomechanical tests are required prior to human studies.Öğe Evaluation of Advanced Platelet Rich Fibrin (A-PRF) on Bone Healing. Is It Better than Old Version? A Histological Animal Study(Amer Scientific Publishers, 2017) Titirinli, Kubra; Tekin, Umut; Atil, Fethi; Onder, M. Ercument; Senguven, Burcu; Ozgul, Ozkan; Kocyigit, Ismail DorukObjective: This study aims to evaluate the effect of fibrin, which is formed with an alteration to the standard PRF centrifugation protocol, on the bone formation. The study additionally aims to assess cell-distribution, and to evaluate the effects of alterations in the speed and duration of centrifugation on the changes in cell-distribution and the formation of hard tissue, by making histological investigations. Materials and methods: Ten New Zealand rabbits were used in this experimental animal study. PRF (2700 rpm, 12 min) and APRF (1500 rpm, 14 min) were placed in the standard bone defects that formed in the right corpus of the mandible randomly. No additional material was placed in the left mandible defect, as a control group. Rabbits were sacrificed after two months, the histological evaluation was performed. Results: There were no marked differences between groups in regard to the quantity of bone formation and bone quality. The quantities of new bone formation were (mean) 56.9%, 55%, 42.5%. Discussion: It may be considered that PRF and its variations have positive effects on the new bone tissue and cell number, and may lead to more rapid ossification compared to the unprocessed bone defects.