A Comparison of Microleakage Scores of Five Different Types of Composite Resins
Göster/ Aç
Tarih
2010Yazar
Dallı, MehmetBahsi, Emrullah
Şahbaz, Cafer
İnce, Bayram
Akkus, Zeki
Ercan, Ertuğrul
Atılgan, S. Serhat
Üst veri
Tüm öğe kaydını gösterKünye
Dalli, M., Bahsi, E., Sahbaz, C., Ince, B., Akkus, Z., Ercan, E., & Atilgan, S. S. (2010). A Comparison of Microleakage Scores of Five Different Types of Composite Resins. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment, 24(4), 2122–2126. https://doi.org/10.2478/V10133-010-0072-9Özet
This study aimed to perform a comparative assessment of microleakage in Class V cavities among five different composite resins For this purpose 100 fresh caries-free human permanent molars were randomly assigned to one of five groups (n=20) Clearfil Majesty Esthetic + Clearfil S3 Bond (Group I) TPH Spectrum + Xeno V (Group II) Gradia Direct Anterior + G Bond (GC) (Group III) Premise + Optibond All in One (Group IV) and Charisma + iBond (Group V) were applied and polymerized under LED Specimens were varnished immersed in 0 5% methylene and sectioned bucco-palatinally/lingually and microleakage scores were determined Gingival and occlusal microleakage scores among groups were statistically significant (p < 0 05) (p=0 043 p=0 005) Occlusal microleakage scores for Clearfil Majesty Esthetic and Premise were lower than in the other groups Charisma had the highest microleakage scores with no difference among the other groups (p > 0 05) In conclusion occlusal and gingival microleakage scores were satisfactory except for Charisma