COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF NASAL SUTURES FOR ENSURING THE CONTINUITY OF NASAL PROJECTION AND MAINTAINING NASAL PROJECTION

dc.contributor.authorAzizli, Elad
dc.contributor.authorOğuz, Oğuzhan
dc.contributor.authorMuluk, Nuray Bayar
dc.contributor.authorDündar, Rıza
dc.contributor.authorCingi, Cemal
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-21T16:15:23Z
dc.date.available2025-01-21T16:15:23Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentKırıkkale Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjectives: In this retrospective study, four sutures frequently used for continuity of tip projection and arrangement of nasolabial angle were compared. Methods: A total of 400 patients who underwent rhinoplasty surgery with Tebbetts tip rotation suture, interdomal suture with cartilage strut, triple cartilage suture and tongue-in-groove suture between 2017 and 2022, completed a one-year postoperative period were included in the study. In 4 centers, four sutures frequently used for continuity of tip projection and arrangement of nasolabial angle were compared. The nasolabial angle and projection from the face were measured by using the lateral photographs taken before and one month, and one year after surgery. Nasolabial angle change between preoperative and postop first month; and postoperative first month-1st year were evaluated, and VAS for patient and surgeon satisfaction from rhinoplasty were evaluated. Results: Tebbett's Tip rotation suture, Interdomal suture with cartilage strut, and Triple cartilage suture's nasolabial angle change values were higher than Tongue-in-groove between preoperative period and postoperative first month; and at the first postoperative period (adjusted <0.0125). From the patients\" view, Group 1's patient satisfaction from the rhinoplasty results in VAS score was significantly higher than Group 4's. From the surgeons\" view, Group 1's surgeon satisfaction from the rhinoplasty results in VAS score was significantly higher than those of Group 2 and Group 4's surgeon satisfaction (adjusted <0.0125). Conclusion: It shows that continuity of tip projection was maintained by Tebbetts Tip rotation suture, interdomain suture with cartilage strut, and triple cartilage suture at one 1-year after the operation.
dc.identifier.endpage197
dc.identifier.issn1303-3263
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.startpage192
dc.identifier.trdizinid1257071
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/1257071
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/22159
dc.identifier.volume22
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofKBB-Forum
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_20241229
dc.subjectDiş Hekimliği
dc.subjectNörolojik Bilimler
dc.subjectKulak
dc.subjectBurun
dc.subjectBoğaz
dc.subjectCerrahi
dc.subjectOrtopedi
dc.titleCOMPARISON OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF NASAL SUTURES FOR ENSURING THE CONTINUITY OF NASAL PROJECTION AND MAINTAINING NASAL PROJECTION
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar