Efficacy of different remineralization agents on treating incipient enamel lesions of primary and permanent teeth

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorTulumbaci F.
dc.contributor.authorOba A.A.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-25T15:18:07Z
dc.date.available2020-06-25T15:18:07Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentKırıkkale Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractAims and Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the in vitro efficacy of different remineralization (RM) agents on RM of artificial caries by evaluating the density, light reflection, and the crystal size of the newly formed mineral in primary and permanent teeth. Materials and Methods: Caries-free primary and permanent molars were divided into seven groups (n = 20) and treated with: G1 - Deionized water, G2 - Colgate Cavity Protection, G3 - Sensodyne Rapid Relief, G4 - GC MI Paste Plus, G5 - Clinpro Tooth Creme, G6 - Clinpro 5000, and G7 - Sensodyne Repair and Protect. Lesion depths were evaluated using laser fluorescence (DIAGNOdent), and polarized light microscopy (PLM), and the minerals were evaluated using X-ray diffractometry (XRD). Results: The highest decrease in laser fluorescence readings was observed in G6 for both primary and permanent teeth. No significant difference was observed between G2, G4, G5, and G6 in permanent teeth and G4 and G6 in primary teeth (P > 0.05). In PLM analyses, lesions depths were found to be lower in G6 compared to the other groups. No significant difference was observed between G2, G4, and G6 (P < 0.05). XRD evaluation showed that the newly formed mineral in G6 was denser and highly crystallized compared to the other groups. Conclusion: This in vitro study demonstrated that Clinpro 5000 is more efficient in remineralizing incipient enamel lesions compared to the other agents tested. © 2019 Journal of Conservative Dentistry.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe work was supported by Kırıkkale University BAPen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4103/JCD.JCD-509-18
dc.identifier.endpage286en_US
dc.identifier.issn09720707
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85068854627
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage281en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD-509-18
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/2632
dc.identifier.volume22en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer Medknow Publicationsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Conservative Dentistry
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectDiagnodenten_US
dc.subjectInitial enamel lesionen_US
dc.subjectPolarized light microscopyen_US
dc.subjectRemineralizationen_US
dc.subjectX-ray diffractometryen_US
dc.titleEfficacy of different remineralization agents on treating incipient enamel lesions of primary and permanent teethen_US
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu