Hukuk ve ceza mahkemesi kararlarının birbirine etkisi
[ X ]
Tarih
2020
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Kırıkkale Üniversitesi
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
Ceza muhakemesi ile hukuk muhakemesi arasında görev ve işleyiş itibariyle farklılıklar bulunması nedeniyle esaslı biçimde birbirlerinden bag?ımsız olmaları gerekmektedir. Türk Borçlar Kanunu'nun 74'üncü maddesi hükmü uyarınca bağımsızlık nisbi özellik taşımakta ve hukuk hakimi ceza hukuku kural ve kararlarını belli ölçüde dikkate almak durumundadır. Ceza mahkemesi ile hukuk mahkemesi kararları bazı hallerde birbirilerinin yargılama sürecini etkilemekte, hatta kimi durumlarda bag?layıcı nitelik arzetmektedir. Ceza ve hukuk mahkemesinde sahtecilik ve yas? düzeltmeye yönelik verilen kararlar bağlayıcı nitelikteki kararlara örnek olarak gösterilebilir. Kanunda bu iki yargı kolu arasındaki ilis?kiyi düzenleyen hükümler yeterli ve kapsamlı olarak düzenlenmemiştir. Bu nedenle ög?retideki görüs?ler ve Yargıtay uygulamalarında farklılıklar görülmektedir. Çalışmamızın amacı, hukuk ve ceza mahkemelerinin yargılama sonucunda verdikleri kararların birbirine etkisini, ne ölçüde dikkate alması gerektiğini teorideki görüs?ler ve Yargıtay uygulamaları ıs?ıg?ında ortaya koymaktır. Ayrıca usul ekonomisine uygun olarak yargılama sürecinin hızlı işlemesi ve mahkemelerin birbiriyle çelis?kili kararlar vermesinin önlenmesine yönelik yol göstermektir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Hukuk Mahkemesi, Ceza Mahkemesi, Kesin Hüküm, Kesin Delil, Etki
Due to the differences between criminal Procedure and civil procedure in terms of duties and functioning, they should be fundamentally independent of each other. According to the provision of Article 74 of the Turkish Code of Obligations, independence has relative characteristics and the judge of law has to take into account the rules and decisions of criminal law to a certain extent. In some cases, the decisions of the Criminal Court and the civil court affect each other's judicial process, and in some cases they are even binding. Decisions made in the criminal and civil court for fraud and age correction can be cited as examples of binding decisions. The provisions governing the relationship between these two judicial branches in the law are not adequately and comprehensively regulated. For this reason, there are differences in views in teaching and Supreme Court applications. The aim of our study is to demonstrate the impact of the decisions of the civil and criminal courts on each other as a result of the trial, to what extent they should take into account the opinions in theory and the practice of the Supreme Court. In addition, in accordance with the procedural economy, the rapid functioning of the judicial process and the Prevention of contradictory decisions by the courts is to guide. Keywords: Court Of Law, Criminal Court, Definitive Judgement, Definitive Evidence, Impact
Due to the differences between criminal Procedure and civil procedure in terms of duties and functioning, they should be fundamentally independent of each other. According to the provision of Article 74 of the Turkish Code of Obligations, independence has relative characteristics and the judge of law has to take into account the rules and decisions of criminal law to a certain extent. In some cases, the decisions of the Criminal Court and the civil court affect each other's judicial process, and in some cases they are even binding. Decisions made in the criminal and civil court for fraud and age correction can be cited as examples of binding decisions. The provisions governing the relationship between these two judicial branches in the law are not adequately and comprehensively regulated. For this reason, there are differences in views in teaching and Supreme Court applications. The aim of our study is to demonstrate the impact of the decisions of the civil and criminal courts on each other as a result of the trial, to what extent they should take into account the opinions in theory and the practice of the Supreme Court. In addition, in accordance with the procedural economy, the rapid functioning of the judicial process and the Prevention of contradictory decisions by the courts is to guide. Keywords: Court Of Law, Criminal Court, Definitive Judgement, Definitive Evidence, Impact
Açıklama
Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Özel Hukuk Ana Bilim Dalı
Anahtar Kelimeler
Hukuk, Law
