THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT INSTRUMENT LUBRICANTS ON SURFACE MICROHARDNESS OF A MICROHYBRID RESIN COMPOSITE
dc.contributor.author | Arhun, Neslihan | |
dc.contributor.author | Kalender, Berçem | |
dc.contributor.author | Çelik, Çiğdem | |
dc.contributor.author | Tuncer, Duygu | |
dc.contributor.author | Berkmen, Begüm | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-01-21T16:16:21Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-01-21T16:16:21Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.department | Kırıkkale Üniversitesi | |
dc.description.abstract | Background and Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the\reffects of different instrument lubricants on the surface\rmicrohardness of a resin composite.\rMaterial and Method: A total of 180 disk-shaped specimens\rof a resin composite (Filtek Z250; 3M-ESPE) were prepared in\rplastic molds and randomly divided into six groups according\rto the lubricants tested (n= 30)—group 1: control (no\rlubricant was used); group 2: ethanol; group 3: etch-and-rinse\radhesive (Adper Single Bond 2; 3M-ESPE); group 4: self-etch\radhesive (Clearfil SE Bond/the use of adhesive bottle only);\rgroup 5: universal adhesive (G-Premio Bond; GC); and group\r6: Bisco modeling resin. The Vickers hardness number was\rassessed using a microhardness tester. Following the baseline\rmeasurements, finishing/polishing procedures were performed,\rand microhardness was remeasured. The data gathered were\rstatistically analyzed (p< 0.05).\rResults: There was a statistically significant difference\rbetween the control and lubricant groups (p< 0.05). Although\rfinishing/polishing procedures improved the microhardness\rvalues in all the groups, a significant difference was found\rbetween the control and lubricant groups, except for the\rethanol group (p< 0.05).\rConclusion: Instrument lubricants changed the surface\rmicrohardness of the resin composite tested. | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 28 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2146-3964 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2146-3972 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | |
dc.identifier.startpage | 22 | |
dc.identifier.trdizinid | 510072 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/510072 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/22396 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 45 | |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | TR-Dizin | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Clinical Dentistry and Research | |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.snmz | KA_20241229 | |
dc.subject | Diş Hekimliği | |
dc.subject | İstatistik ve Olasılık | |
dc.title | THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT INSTRUMENT LUBRICANTS ON SURFACE MICROHARDNESS OF A MICROHYBRID RESIN COMPOSITE | |
dc.type | Article |