Comparison of sympathectomy and cilostazol treatment results in non-revascularized critical leg ischemia

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorGültekin, Yıldırım
dc.contributor.authorBolat, Ali
dc.contributor.authorGemalmaz, Hüseyin
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-21T16:11:48Z
dc.date.available2025-01-21T16:11:48Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentKırıkkale Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this retrospective study is to compare the efficacy of sympathectomy and cilostazol therapy in critical limb ischemia that cannot be revascularized. Material and Method: This study was retrospectively conducted on 30 patients who underwent lumbar sympathectomy (Group 1) and received cilotazol treatment (Group 2) between January 2017 and August 2020. Demographic data, comorbidity, complications, wound healing, walking distance and pain scale records of the patients were determined by examining the hospital registry system and statistical analysis was performed. Results: In the study, no significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of walking distance and ischemic pain in the statistical analysis of the data before treatment, at the 3rd, 6th, 12th and 24th months (p>0.05). However, a statistically significant difference was found between the pre-treatment data and the data at the 3rd, 6th, 12th and 24th months in both Group 1 and Group 2 in terms of walking distance and ischemic pain (p<0.001 ). In the time periods followed in both groups, it was observed that there was an increase in walking distance and a decrease in ischemic pain. Conclusion: Cilostazol treatment may be preferred as a good alternative treatment method compared to lumbar sympathectomy in critical leg ischemia.
dc.identifier.doi10.32322/jhsm.911909
dc.identifier.endpage371
dc.identifier.issn2636-8579
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.startpage366
dc.identifier.trdizinid1154393
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.911909
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/1154393
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/21569
dc.identifier.volume4
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of health sciences and medicine (Online)
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_20241229
dc.subjectPeriferik Damar Hastalıkları
dc.subjectGenel ve Dahili Tıp
dc.subjectKalp ve Kalp Damar Sistemi
dc.subjectFarmakoloji ve Eczacılık
dc.titleComparison of sympathectomy and cilostazol treatment results in non-revascularized critical leg ischemia
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu