Comparison of uterine artery Doppler sonography, saline infusion sonography and endometrial biopsy in premenopausal patients with abnormal uterine bleeding who were found to have endometrial polyps

dc.contributor.authorKoç H.
dc.contributor.authorNoyan V.
dc.contributor.authorYücel A.
dc.contributor.authorSağsöz N.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-25T15:14:31Z
dc.date.available2020-06-25T15:14:31Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.departmentKırıkkale Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study was to compare uterine artery doppler sonography, saline infusion sonography and endometrial biopsy results in premenopausal patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. Material and Methods: This study was performed on 60 premenopausal patients who had abnormal uterine bleeding and whose endometrial thickness were ? 5 mm. Transvaginal ultrasonography, uterine artery Doppler sonography and saline hydrosonography were performed for each patient. Afterwards, endometrial biopsies were performed and sent to the pathology department. After the pathology results were delivered, 25 patients were included in the endometrial polyp group. Patients with abnormal uterine bleeding, who didn't have any intracavitary lesions were considered as the control group. The result for transvaginal ultrasonography, uterine artery doppler sonography and saline hydrosonography were compared with pathology results. Results: The mean uterine artery resistance index value in the endometrial polyp group was 0.63 ± 0.2 and in the control group it was 0.66 ± 0.17 (p= 0.48). The mean uterine artery pulsatility index in the endometrial polyp group was 1.75 ± 0.74 and in the control group it was 1.95 ± 0.63 (p= 0.31). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of saline hydrosonography in directly visualizing endometrial polyps were 96%, 84.6%, 95.7% and 85.7%, respectively (p< 0.05). Conclusion: Uterine artery doppler sonography dose not have any additive value to conventional ultrasonography and salin hydrosonography, in differentiating endometrial polyps from patients with abnormal uterine bleeding who do not have any intracavitary lesions. Copyright © 2010 by Türkiye Klinikleri.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage246en_US
dc.identifier.issn13000306
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-77956672573
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A
dc.identifier.startpage241en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/2129
dc.identifier.volume20en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isotr
dc.relation.ispartofTurkiye Klinikleri Jinekoloji Obstetrik
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectDoppleren_US
dc.subjectUltrasonographyen_US
dc.subjectUterine hemorrhageen_US
dc.titleComparison of uterine artery Doppler sonography, saline infusion sonography and endometrial biopsy in premenopausal patients with abnormal uterine bleeding who were found to have endometrial polypsen_US
dc.title.alternativeAnormal uterin kanama ile başvuran ve endometriyal polip saptanan hastalarda uterin arter Doppler sonografi, salin hidrosonografi ve patoloji sonuçlarinin karşilaştirilmasien_US
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar