ANONİM ŞİRKETLERDE ISKAT
[ X ]
Tarih
2020
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
Özet
Iskat, anonim şirketlerde sermaye koyma borcunu yerine getirmeyen temerrüde düşmüş pay sahibi hakkında uygulanan en ağır yaptırımlardan biridir. Pay sahibi, ıskat kararı uygulanan payları üzerindeki tüm haklarını ve ıskat kararı hüküm doğuruncaya kadar o pay için yapmış olduğu kısmi ödemelerden mahrum kalmaktadır.Usulüne uygun olarak alınmayan ıskat kararları hakkında, pay sahibi butlan, yokluk, iptal davası ve yönetim kurulu üyelerinin sorumluluğu davası açabilecektir. Pay sahibinin ıskat uygulanan paylardan başka şirkette payı yoksa, ıskat kararı ile ortak şirketen çıkarılmış olacaktır.Iskat uygulanan paylar şirkete geçmekte olup,paylar başka birisine satılıncaya kadar donmakta, bu payların oy hakkı bulunmamaktadır.Iskat pay sahibi hakkında değil, paylar hakkında uygulanmaktadır. Çalışmada anonim şirket ortaklarından taahhüt etmiş olduğu sermaye koyma borcunu yerine getirmeyen ortağa karşı işletilebilecek olan ıskat kurumunu, ıskat sürecinin işleyişini ve hukuken doğurduğu sonuçlar incelenmiş ve bilgi verilmiştir.
Forfeiture of Rights is one of the most severe sanctions that would be implemented against a shareholder who has defaulted and who would not be able to invest in capital. A shareholder will be alienated from all his rights on the forfeited shares, and will be alienated from partial payments that he/she has made for that share until up to that time. A shareholder may be able to initiate an annulment, an avoidance, a recission, or the responsibility of the Board of Directors cause of action on unduly taken forfeiture decisions. If the shareholder does not have any other shares in the company other than the forfeited shares, following a forfeiture decision he/she will be completely alienated from the corporation. Forfeited shares will be transferred to the corporation, they will freeze until they are sold to a third party, and they will not have any voting rights. The forfeiture would be implemented on the shares; but it would not be implemented on the shareholder. In this study, the forfeiture procedure that would be implemented against a shareholder of a corporation who made a promise to invest but would not be able to fulfill his/her obligation to invest, how the forfeiture process works, and its legal ramifications are analysed.
Forfeiture of Rights is one of the most severe sanctions that would be implemented against a shareholder who has defaulted and who would not be able to invest in capital. A shareholder will be alienated from all his rights on the forfeited shares, and will be alienated from partial payments that he/she has made for that share until up to that time. A shareholder may be able to initiate an annulment, an avoidance, a recission, or the responsibility of the Board of Directors cause of action on unduly taken forfeiture decisions. If the shareholder does not have any other shares in the company other than the forfeited shares, following a forfeiture decision he/she will be completely alienated from the corporation. Forfeited shares will be transferred to the corporation, they will freeze until they are sold to a third party, and they will not have any voting rights. The forfeiture would be implemented on the shares; but it would not be implemented on the shareholder. In this study, the forfeiture procedure that would be implemented against a shareholder of a corporation who made a promise to invest but would not be able to fulfill his/her obligation to invest, how the forfeiture process works, and its legal ramifications are analysed.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynak
Legal Mali Hukuk Dergisi
WoS Q Değeri
Scopus Q Değeri
Cilt
16
Sayı
182
Künye
Bu makale açık erişimli değildir.
