Clinical, radiographic, diagnostic and cephalometric features of pycnodysostosis in comparison with Turkish cephalometric norms: A case report

dc.contributor.authorKamak H.
dc.contributor.authorKamak G.
dc.contributor.authorYavuz I.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-25T15:17:14Z
dc.date.available2020-06-25T15:17:14Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.departmentKırıkkale Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractPycnodysostosis is a rare genetic disorder and was first described in 1962 by Maroteaux and Lamy. The incidence of this anomaly is estimated to be 1.7 per 1 million births. The principal characteristics of this disorder are short stature, prominent eyes with blue sclera, beaked nose, cranial dysplasia, exposed fontanelles and cranial sutures, clavicular dysplasia, total/partial dysplasia of the terminal phalanges, obtused mandibular gonial angle, and generally increased bone density. Some features of pycnodysostosis are similar to osteopetrosis and cleidocranial dysostosis. Therefore, it must be distinguished from osteopetrosis and cleidocranial dysostosis in order to diagnose it in individuals of a younger age. The aims of this case report were to show the clinical, radiographic, and diagnostic features, as well as the cephalometric characteristics of pycnodysostosis in comparison with Turkish cephalometric norms.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage459en_US
dc.identifier.issn13057456
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84868106381
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage454en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/2226
dc.identifier.volume6en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Dentistry
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCleidocranial dysostosisen_US
dc.subjectDiagnosisen_US
dc.subjectOsteopetrosisen_US
dc.subjectPycnodysostosisen_US
dc.titleClinical, radiographic, diagnostic and cephalometric features of pycnodysostosis in comparison with Turkish cephalometric norms: A case reporten_US
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar