Ten years' data of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS): A naturalistic, observational study outcome in clinical practice

dc.authoridUZUN, OZCAN/0000-0002-4244-6911
dc.authoridGundogmus, Ibrahim/0000-0002-1921-1495
dc.contributor.authorBolu, Abdullah
dc.contributor.authorGundogmus, Ibrahim
dc.contributor.authorAydin, Mehmet Sinan
dc.contributor.authorFadiloglu, Duygu
dc.contributor.authorErken, Yasemin
dc.contributor.authorUzun, Ozcan
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-21T16:44:51Z
dc.date.available2025-01-21T16:44:51Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentKırıkkale Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) is used reliably as an alternative method in the treatment of a number of treatment-resistant psychiatric disorders. However, information about the daily practice is limited. In this article, we aim to report and discuss the 10-years results of a clinic that applies TMS to treatment-resistant psychiatric disorders. This naturalistic study is a retrospective review of data routinely collected from patients undergoing TMS between 2010 and 2020. A total of 284 patients with diagnoses of major depressive disorder (MDD), obsessive-compulsive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) were included in the study. The mean age of the participants was 40.49 +/- 12.64 years. In general, when the responses of all patients were examined, 26.1% were evaluated as response, 29.2% as partial response, and 44.7% as inadequate response. It has been determined that MDD responds to treatment better than other disorders. Regardless of the diagnosis, a significant relationship was found between response and age. The multivariate logistic regression analysis suggested that patients with improvement from TMS were less likely to have advanced age and not to have been diagnosed with PTSD. The idea that TMS may be useful for some patients, but not every patient, is supported.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.psychres.2021.113986
dc.identifier.issn0165-1781
dc.identifier.issn1872-7123
dc.identifier.pmid34022659
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2021.113986
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/25531
dc.identifier.volume301
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000661120000026
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Ireland Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofPsychiatry Research
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_20241229
dc.subjectTranscranial magnetic stimulation; Major depressive disorder; Obsessive-compulsive disorder; Generalized anxiety disorder; Post-traumatic stress disorder; Treatment resistant
dc.titleTen years' data of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS): A naturalistic, observational study outcome in clinical practice
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar