International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorWise, Sarah K.
dc.contributor.authorLin, Sandra Y.
dc.contributor.authorToskala, Elina
dc.contributor.authorOrlandi, Richard R.
dc.contributor.authorAkdis, Cezmi A.
dc.contributor.authorAlt, Jeremiah A.
dc.contributor.authorWillson, Thomas J.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-25T18:29:44Z
dc.date.available2020-06-25T18:29:44Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentKırıkkale Üniversitesi
dc.descriptionCustovic, Adnan/0000-0001-5218-7071; Levy, Joshua M/0000-0001-5907-3421; DR. FARID, S.H. M.H. M. Kn. - FR FARID/0000-0003-0372-4963; Jarvis, Deborah/0000-0002-1753-3896; RONDON SEGOVIA, CARMEN/0000-0003-0976-3402; CANONICA, GIORGIO WALTER/0000-0001-8467-2557; Thomas, Andrew/0000-0002-5890-1325; Ciprandi, Giorgio/0000-0001-7016-8421; Larenas Linnemann, Desiree/0000-0002-5713-5331
dc.description.abstractBackground: Critical examination of the quality and validity of available allergic rhinitis (AR) literature is necessary to improve understanding and to appropriately translate this knowledge to clinical care of the AR patient. To evaluate the existing AR literature, international multidisciplinary experts with an interest in AR have produced the International Consensus statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (ICAR:AR). Methods: Using previously described methodology, specific topics were developed relating to AR. Each topic was assigned a literature review, evidence-based review (EBR), or evidence-based review with recommendations (EBRR) format as dictated by available evidence and purpose within the ICAR:AR document. Following iterative reviews of each topic, the ICAR:AR document was synthesized and reviewed by all authors for consensus. Results: The ICAR:AR document addresses over 100 individual topics related to AR, including diagnosis, pathophysiology, epidemiology, disease burden, risk factors for the development of AR, allergy testing modalities, treatment, and other conditions/comorbidities associated with AR. Conclusion: This critical review of the AR literature has identified several strengths; providers can be confident that treatment decisions are supported by rigorous studies. However, there are also substantial gaps in the AR literature. These knowledge gaps should be viewed as opportunities for improvement, as often the things that we teach and the medicine that we practice are not based on the best quality evidence. This document aims to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the AR literature to identify areas for future AR research and improved understanding. (C) 2018 ARS-AAOA, LLC.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAmerican Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy Foundationen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe American Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy Foundation provided funding for administrative support in preparation of this document but exercised no control over its content.en_US
dc.identifier.citationWise, SK, Lin, SY, Toskala, E, et al. International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2018; 8: 108– 352.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/alr.22073
dc.identifier.endpage352en_US
dc.identifier.issn2042-6976
dc.identifier.issn2042-6984
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid29438602
dc.identifier.startpage108en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/alr.22073
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/7440
dc.identifier.volume8en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000424909200003
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Forum Of Allergy & Rhinology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectallergen extracten_US
dc.subjectallergyen_US
dc.subjectallergen immunotherapyen_US
dc.subjectallergic rhinitisen_US
dc.subjectantihistamineen_US
dc.subjectasthmaen_US
dc.subjectatopic dermatitisen_US
dc.subjectavoidanceen_US
dc.subjectbiologicen_US
dc.subjectcockroachen_US
dc.subjectconjunctivitisen_US
dc.subjectconsensusen_US
dc.subjectcorticosteroiden_US
dc.subjectcoughen_US
dc.subjectcromolynen_US
dc.subjectdecongestanten_US
dc.subjecteosinophilic esophagitisen_US
dc.subjectenvironmenten_US
dc.subjectepicutaneous immunotherapyen_US
dc.subjectepidemiologyen_US
dc.subjectevidence-based medicineen_US
dc.subjectfood allergyen_US
dc.subjectgeneticsen_US
dc.subjecthouse dust miteen_US
dc.subjectIgEen_US
dc.subjectimmunoglobulin Een_US
dc.subjectimmunotherapyen_US
dc.subjectinhalant allergyen_US
dc.subjectleukotrieneen_US
dc.subjectmicrobiomeen_US
dc.subjectoccupational rhinitisen_US
dc.subjectomalizumaben_US
dc.subjectpathophysiologyen_US
dc.subjectperennialen_US
dc.subjectpet danderen_US
dc.subjectpollenen_US
dc.subjectprobioticen_US
dc.subjectquality of lifeen_US
dc.subjectrhinitisen_US
dc.subjectrhinosinusitisen_US
dc.subjectrisk factoren_US
dc.subjectsalineen_US
dc.subjectseasonalen_US
dc.subjectsensitizationen_US
dc.subjectsinusitisen_US
dc.subjectsleepen_US
dc.subjectsocioeconomicen_US
dc.subjectspecific IgEen_US
dc.subjectsubcutaneous immunotherapyen_US
dc.subjectsublingual immunotherapyen_US
dc.subjectsystematic reviewen_US
dc.subjectrhinitisen_US
dc.subjecttotal IgEen_US
dc.subjecttranscutaneous immunotherapyen_US
dc.subjectvalidated surveyen_US
dc.titleInternational Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitisen_US
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology Allergic Rhinitis.pdf
Boyut:
4.05 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin/Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WOS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu