Comparison of intrahepatic vein-to-liver parenchyma and intercostal muscle-to-liver parenchyma strain ratios in the assessment of liver fibrosis: which one should we use?

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorAltiparmak, Bahri
dc.contributor.authorNural, Mehmet Selim
dc.contributor.authorAydin, Ramazan
dc.contributor.authorDanaci, Murat
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-21T16:36:48Z
dc.date.available2025-01-21T16:36:48Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentKırıkkale Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractThe aims of this study were to investigate whether there is a difference in diagnostic value between vein to parenchyma strain ratio (VPSR) and muscle to parenchyma strain ratio (MPSR). VPSR and MPSR were calculated via sonoelastography, and were recorded for comparison with histopathology. ROC analysis, the Mann-Whitney U test, the Kruskal-Wallis test, and Spearman's rank correlation test were used for statistical analysis. The study included 59 cases of individuals who underwent biopsy (29 women, 30 men). When the threshold value for VPSR was set at 3.23, the sensitivity was 96.2% and the specificity was 83.3% (p < 0.001, F a parts per thousand yen 1). When the threshold value was set at 3.01 for MPR, the sensitivity was 88.7% and the specificity was 83.3% (p < 0.001, F a parts per thousand yen 1). The areas under the curve values were VPSR 0.95 and MPSR 0.92 for F a parts per thousand yen 1, VPSR 0.94 and MPSR 0.92 for F a parts per thousand yen 2, and VPSR 1.00 and MPSR 0.76 for F = 3 (p < 0.001). The Spearman's correlation coefficient was 0.75, and a high positive concordance was found between VPSR and MPSR (p < 0.001). In this study, a high positive correlation was observed between two strain ratios, and VPSR was found to be more reliable than MPSR in determining liver fibrosis.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00261-014-0294-7
dc.identifier.endpage737
dc.identifier.issn0942-8925
dc.identifier.issn1432-0509
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.pmid25408430
dc.identifier.startpage730
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0294-7
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/24388
dc.identifier.volume40
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000351697000006
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofAbdominal Imaging
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_20241229
dc.subjectLiver fibrosis; Percutaneous biopsy; Sonoelastography; Strain ratio
dc.titleComparison of intrahepatic vein-to-liver parenchyma and intercostal muscle-to-liver parenchyma strain ratios in the assessment of liver fibrosis: which one should we use?
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WOS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu