The effect of nanocoatings of SiO2, TiO2, and ZrO2 on titanium-porcelain bonding

dc.contributor.authorAtsu, Saadet Saglam
dc.contributor.authorAksan, Muhammed Emin
dc.contributor.authorBulut, Ali Can
dc.contributor.authorTamimi, Faleh
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-21T16:28:40Z
dc.date.available2025-01-21T16:28:40Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentKırıkkale Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractStatement of problem: Durable titanium-porcelain bonding is challenging because of the formation of a thick oxide layer on the surface during porcelain firing. Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate how atomic layer deposition (ALD) of different oxide coatings affected titanium-porcelain bonding and failure types. Material and methods: Forty-four airborne-particle abraded Type-2 titanium specimens were coated by ALD with either SiO2, TiO2, or ZrO2 (n=11) at a thickness of 30 nm, whereas control specimens were left uncoated (n=11) (airborne-particle abraded only). The surface roughness of the specimens was analyzed with a profilometer before applying porcelain (Vita Titankeramic). Titanium-porcelain bonding was analyzed by using a 3-point bend test. Surface properties and titanium-porcelain interfaces were examined under scanning electron microscopy combined with energy-dispersive spectroscopy, and failure types were evaluated by using a stereomicroscope. Surface roughness and bond strength data were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests. Failure type data were analyzed by the Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact test (?=.05). Results: All nanocoatings increased surface roughness values, but only TiO2 and ZrO2 coatings showed statistically significant higher roughness than the control surfaces (P<.001). Specimens coated with SiO2 (28.59 ±4.37 MPa) and TiO2 (26.86 ±3.66 MPa) presented significantly higher bonding strength than control (22.04 ±4.59 MPa) specimens (P<.01). Fracture types of different groups were not statistically different (P>.05). Conclusions: Nanocoating titanium surfaces with SiO2 and TiO2 by using the ALD technique significantly improved titanium-porcelain bonding. © 2021 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
dc.description.sponsorshipK?r?kkale University Scientific Research Institute; Kırıkkale University Scientific Research Institute, (2015/102)
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.04.023
dc.identifier.endpage222.e8
dc.identifier.issn0022-3913
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.pmid34090660
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85108221002
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage222.e1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.04.023
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/23608
dc.identifier.volume126
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMosby Inc.
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Prosthetic Dentistry
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_20241229
dc.subjectDental Bonding; Dental Porcelain; Materials Testing; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning; Silicon Dioxide; Surface Properties; Titanium; dental porcelain; silicon dioxide; titanium; titanium dioxide; dental bonding; materials testing; scanning electron microscopy; surface property
dc.titleThe effect of nanocoatings of SiO2, TiO2, and ZrO2 on titanium-porcelain bonding
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar