How compatible is clinical diagnosis with electrophysiology?

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorTürkel Y.
dc.contributor.authorSandikçi U.
dc.contributor.authorEr D.
dc.contributor.authorYazici T.
dc.contributor.authorBayrak A.O.
dc.contributor.authorTürker H.Y.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-25T15:17:31Z
dc.date.available2020-06-25T15:17:31Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentKırıkkale Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractAim: The objective of this study was to investigate the correlation of the clinical diagnosis of patients referred to the electroneuromyography laboratory with the electrophysiological diagnosis. Material and Method: Eight hundred eighty two patients were enrolled in the study. Their ages, genders, the clinic that referred the patient, the clinical diagnosis, and the electrophysiological results were registered retrospectively and the results were statistically evaluated. Results: Five hundred twenty four of 882 patients enrolled in the study were women, while 358 of them were men. Four hundred hundred ninety nine (56,6%) of the patients were consulted by the Neurology department, 222 (25,2%) patients were consulted by the Neurosurgery deparment, 59 (6,7%) patients were consulted by the Physical medicine and rehabilitation deparment while 61 (6,9%) patients were referred by the Orthopedy department and 41 (4,6%) by other departments. Carpal tunnel syndrome was the most frequent clinical diagnosis (28,7%). Only in a small group of patients symptoms were assessed rather than the clinical diagnosis (2,9%). In 49,1% of the patients, There was correlation between clinical and electrophysiological diagnosis while 44,7% of patients had normal electroneuromyography results. Discussion: The high rate of the normal electroneuromyography tests and the statistically significant discordance of clinical diagnosis of patients with their electrophysiological test results show that, there are inessential electroneuromyography reguests.en_US
dc.identifier.citationTürkel, Y., Sandıkçı, U., Er, D., Yazıcı, T., Bayrak, A. O., Türker, Y. H. (2014). How Compatible is Clinical Diagnosis with Electrophysiology?. Journal of Clinical and Analytical Medicine, 5(5), 366 - 368.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4328/JCAM.1409
dc.identifier.endpage368en_US
dc.identifier.issn13090720
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84900344892
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A
dc.identifier.startpage366en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid184423
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4328/JCAM.1409
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/2410
dc.identifier.volume5en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000215566500006
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherJournal of Clinical and Analytical Medicineen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical and Analytical Medicine
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectElectroneuromyographyen_US
dc.subjectPreliminary diagnosisen_US
dc.subjectRequest concordanceen_US
dc.titleHow compatible is clinical diagnosis with electrophysiology?en_US
dc.title.alternativeKlinik ön tanı ve elektronöromiyografik i?nceleme ne kadar uyumlu?en_US
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
e25aec07-3f4b-4499-9fa1-8c30d6664dbc.pdf
Boyut:
527.35 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam metin/Full text
İndir

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu
TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
WOS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu