Regional differences of Turkey in risk factors of newborn hearing loss

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorKonukseven, Ozlem
dc.contributor.authorKaya, Sule
dc.contributor.authorGenc, Aydan
dc.contributor.authorMuluk, Nuray Bayar
dc.contributor.authorBasar, Figen Suren
dc.contributor.authorKirkim, Gunay
dc.contributor.authorDincol, Ilknur
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-25T18:22:38Z
dc.date.available2020-06-25T18:22:38Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentKırıkkale Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study was to discover Turkish regional differences in the risk factors of newborn hearing loss. Method: A multi-centered retrospective design was used. A total of 443 children, registered to the national newborn hearing screening programme, with bilateral hearing loss, from five different regions of Turkey, were evaluated in terms of the types of hearing loss, the degree of hearing loss, the types of risk factors, parental consanguinity, age at diagnosis and age of auditory intervention, respectively. Results: There was no significant difference in the prevalence of hearing loss between regions (chi(2) = 3.210, P = 0.523). Symmetric Sensorineural Hearing Loss (SSHL) was the most common type of HL in all regions (91.8%). Profound HL was the most common degree of HL in all regions (46.2%). There were statistically significant differences between regions in terms of types of HL (chi(2) = 14.151, P = 0.000). As a total, 323 (72.9%) of subjects did not have any risk factors. There were statistically significant differences between regions in terms of the types of risk factors (pre, pen and post-natal) for SSNHL (chi(2) = 16.095, P = 0.000). For all regions, the age of diagnosis was convenient with the JCIH criteria. However the age of hearing aid application was prolonged in some regions. There were statistically significant differences between regions in terms of the age of diagnosis (chi(2) = 93.570, P = 0.000) and the age of auditory intervention (chi(2) = 47.323, P = 0.000). The confounding effects of gender, age of diagnosis, age of hearing aids applications, HL in the family, types of risk factors for HL on SSNHL were detected. Conclusion: To reach the goal of a high quality newborn hearing screening, there is a need to develop an evidence-based standard for follow up guideline. In addition, risk factors should be re-evaluated according to regional differences and all regions should take their own precautions according to their evidence based data. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.citationclosedAccessen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.08.028
dc.identifier.endpage55en_US
dc.identifier.issn0165-5876
dc.identifier.issn1872-8464
dc.identifier.pmid29106875
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85028808622
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage49en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.08.028
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/6841
dc.identifier.volume102en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000415777600010
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Ireland Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal Of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectSymmetric sensorineural hearing lossen_US
dc.subjectRisk factorsen_US
dc.subjectParental consanguinityen_US
dc.titleRegional differences of Turkey in risk factors of newborn hearing lossen_US
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ X ]
İsim:
Regional differences of Turkey in risk factors of newborn hearing loss.pdf
Boyut:
528.27 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin/Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WOS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu