Comparison between intravenous and thoracic epidural analgesia in single coronary artery bypass graft surgery

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorSalman, Nevriye
dc.contributor.authorSerter, Fatih Tanzer
dc.contributor.authorUcar, Halil Ibrahim
dc.contributor.authorGunaydin, Serdar
dc.contributor.authorYorgancioglu, Ali Cem
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-25T18:06:32Z
dc.date.available2020-06-25T18:06:32Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.departmentKırıkkale Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractAim: To compare thoracic epidural analgesia with intravenous analgesia in patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 40 patients who had received elective single artery bypass surgery. After general anesthesia, one group was given patient-controlled thoracic epidural analgesia and the other group was given patient-controlled intravenous meperidine analgesia. Patient assessments were performed during the postoperative period and included the duration of hospital stay, pain and sedation scores, ambulation score, atrial fibrillation incidence, and organ morbidities. Results: No differences were detected between the groups in the demographic or intraoperative data. However, a statistically significant difference was detected in favor of thoracic epidural analgesia for the duration of extubation and hospital stay, pain control, sedation grade, mobilization, and quality of recovery scores. Conclusion: After single coronary artery surgery, thoracic epidural analgesia was more effective than intravenous analgesia; it also enabled earlier tracheal extubation and a shorter hospitalization period.en_US
dc.identifier.citationSalman N., Serter F. T., Uçar H. İ., Günaydın S., Yorgancıoğlu A. C. (2012). Comparison between intravenous and thoracic epidural analgesia in single coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 42(4), 581 - 589.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3906/sag-1107-9
dc.identifier.endpage589en_US
dc.identifier.issn1300-0144
dc.identifier.issn1303-6165
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84861322242
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage581en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid136041
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3906/sag-1107-9
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/5231
dc.identifier.volume42en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000306195600005
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTubitak Scientific & Technical Research Council Turkeyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish Journal Of Medical Sciences
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCoronary artery bypass graftingen_US
dc.subjectanalgesiaen_US
dc.subjectepiduralen_US
dc.subjectquality of recoveryen_US
dc.titleComparison between intravenous and thoracic epidural analgesia in single coronary artery bypass graft surgeryen_US
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
ad191880-f4c8-4d14-a832-9378a101ea16.pdf
Boyut:
275.67 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam metin/Full text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WOS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu