A Comparison of Microleakage Scores of Five Different Types of Composite Resins

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorDallı, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorBahsi, Emrullah
dc.contributor.authorŞahbaz, Cafer
dc.contributor.authorİnce, Bayram
dc.contributor.authorAkkus, Zeki
dc.contributor.authorErcan, Ertuğrul
dc.contributor.authorAtılgan, S. Serhat
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-25T17:49:06Z
dc.date.available2020-06-25T17:49:06Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.departmentKırıkkale Üniversitesi
dc.descriptionERCAN, Ertugrul/0000-0002-4753-6553
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to perform a comparative assessment of microleakage in Class V cavities among five different composite resins For this purpose 100 fresh caries-free human permanent molars were randomly assigned to one of five groups (n=20) Clearfil Majesty Esthetic + Clearfil S3 Bond (Group I) TPH Spectrum + Xeno V (Group II) Gradia Direct Anterior + G Bond (GC) (Group III) Premise + Optibond All in One (Group IV) and Charisma + iBond (Group V) were applied and polymerized under LED Specimens were varnished immersed in 0 5% methylene and sectioned bucco-palatinally/lingually and microleakage scores were determined Gingival and occlusal microleakage scores among groups were statistically significant (p < 0 05) (p=0 043 p=0 005) Occlusal microleakage scores for Clearfil Majesty Esthetic and Premise were lower than in the other groups Charisma had the highest microleakage scores with no difference among the other groups (p > 0 05) In conclusion occlusal and gingival microleakage scores were satisfactory except for Charismaen_US
dc.identifier.citationDalli, M., Bahsi, E., Sahbaz, C., Ince, B., Akkus, Z., Ercan, E., & Atilgan, S. S. (2010). A Comparison of Microleakage Scores of Five Different Types of Composite Resins. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment, 24(4), 2122–2126. https://doi.org/10.2478/V10133-010-0072-9en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2478/V10133-010-0072-9
dc.identifier.endpage2126en_US
dc.identifier.issn1310-2818
dc.identifier.issn1314-3530
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-78649789313
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage2122en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.2478/V10133-010-0072-9
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/4639
dc.identifier.volume24en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000284717900015
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofBiotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectmicroleakageen_US
dc.subjectdifferent composite resinsen_US
dc.subjectself-etching adhesive systemsen_US
dc.subjectmethylene blueen_US
dc.subjectcervical lesionen_US
dc.titleA Comparison of Microleakage Scores of Five Different Types of Composite Resinsen_US
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
A Comparison of Microleakage Scores of Five.pdf
Boyut:
2.15 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin/Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WOS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu