Comparison of dentin penetration ability of different root canal sealers used with different obturation methods

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorTurkyilmaz, Ali
dc.contributor.authorErdemir, Ali
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-14T18:10:29Z
dc.date.available2021-01-14T18:10:29Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentKKÜ
dc.descriptionTurkyilmaz, Ali/0000-0003-0641-0062
dc.description.abstractThis in vitro study aimed to investigate the tubular penetration depth of four different sealers used with two different obturation methods in the apical, middle, and coronal root canal dentin. Eighty-four single-rooted teeth were instrumented until the F4 ProTaper universal rotary file and filled with AH26, AH Plus (Dentsply, DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany), RealSeal (SybronEndo, Orange, CA), and MTA Fillapex (Angelus, Londrina, Brazil) using cold lateral condensation (CLC) and single-cone (SC) obturation techniques. Thereafter, the roots were sectioned longitudinal and prepared for scanning electron microscope evaluation. The maximum and minimum sealers penetration depth into dentinal tubules at the apical, middle, and coronal regions and the average depth of sealer penetration were calculated. The data was statistically analyzed two-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey and Dunnett tests and independent samplesttest using maximum mean values. There was no statistically difference between the obturation methods (p> .05). When the sealers are evaluated within themselves AH26 was affected by obturation methods significantly (p< .05). Also the results revealed a significant difference between root regions (p< .05). AH26 and RealSeal root canal sealers had the highest penetration values with CLC and SC obturation techniques, respectively. The obturation method did not affect the penetration amount of root canal sealers. RealSeal root canal sealer performed better penetration ability than the other sealers. Apical third of the root in all groups showed lowest penetration depth.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific Research Projects Coordination Center of Kirikkale University, Kirikkale/TurkeyKirikkale University [2012/94]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific Research Projects Coordination Center of Kirikkale University, Kirikkale/Turkey, Grant/Award Number: 2012/94en_US
dc.identifier.citationBu makale açık erişimli değildir.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jemt.23548
dc.identifier.endpage1551en_US
dc.identifier.issn1059-910X
dc.identifier.issn1097-0029
dc.identifier.issue12en_US
dc.identifier.pmid32735400
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85088808946
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage1544en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.23548
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12587/12629
dc.identifier.volume83en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000553969300001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWILEYen_US
dc.relation.ispartofMICROSCOPY RESEARCH AND TECHNIQUE
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectMTA Fillapexen_US
dc.subjectroot canal sealeren_US
dc.subjectsealer penetrationen_US
dc.subjectsingle-cone techniqueen_US
dc.titleComparison of dentin penetration ability of different root canal sealers used with different obturation methodsen_US
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ X ]
İsim:
jemt.23548.pdf
Boyut:
2.33 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam metin/ Full text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WOS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu